Re: Fwd: Operator binding

ürgen Sauermann: Hi, in following up the recent email discussions with Jay Foad and Hans-Peter Sorge, I have changed the operator-to-operator binding in GNU APL. *SVN 1367*. Before the change an expression with 2 adjacent operators, for example 2 / / 3 4⍴5, would have given this: * B←**3

Re: Fwd: Operator binding

Foad and Hans-Peter Sorge, I have changed the operator-to-operator binding in GNU APL. SVN 1367. Before the change an _expression_ with 2 adjacent operators, for example 2 / / 3 4⍴5, would have given this:

Fwd: Operator binding

10 10 10 10 10 10 10    but it is  625¨⍴5 10 15 20 25 Just asking ..:-) Best Regards Hans-Peter Am 02.12.20 um 17:27 schrieb Dr. Jürgen Sauermann: Hi, in following up the recent email discussions with Jay Foad and Hans-Peter Sorge, I have changed the operator-to-operator binding in

Re: Operator binding

Hi Elias, On 12/2/20 6:22 PM, Elias Mårtenson wrote: On Thu, 3 Dec 2020 at 00:41, Jay Foad > wrote: Great, this sounds like exactly the right thing to do if you're aiming for APL2 compatibility. Dyalog has to jump through some hoops when it parses 2//B, t

Re: Operator binding

On Wed, 2 Dec 2020 at 17:22, Elias Mårtenson wrote: > > On Thu, 3 Dec 2020 at 00:41, Jay Foad wrote: >> >> Great, this sounds like exactly the right thing to do if you're aiming >> for APL2 compatibility. >> >> Dyalog has to jump through some hoops when it parses 2//B, to treat >> the first / as

Re: Operator binding

On Thu, 3 Dec 2020 at 00:41, Jay Foad wrote: > Great, this sounds like exactly the right thing to do if you're aiming > for APL2 compatibility. > > Dyalog has to jump through some hoops when it parses 2//B, to treat > the first / as a function but the second / as an operator. APL2's > parsing rul

Re: Operator binding

0 at 16:27, Dr. Jürgen Sauermann wrote: > > Hi, > > in following up the recent email discussions with Jay Foad and Hans-Peter > Sorge, > I have changed the operator-to-operator binding in GNU APL. SVN 1367. > > Before the change an expression with 2 adjacent operators, >

Operator binding

Hi, in following up the recent email discussions with Jay Foad and Hans-Peter Sorge, I have changed the operator-to-operator binding in GNU APL. SVN 1367. Before the change an _expression_ with 2 adjacent operators, for example 2