I agree. I would love to see lexical scope and closures, for example.
Regards,
Elias
On 28 Jul 2014 01:49, "Blake McBride" wrote:
> Dear Juergen,
>
> As I play with lambdas, I see many, many anomalies (like passing them, the
> difference between execution and passing, re-assignments, etc.). I
>
Dear Juergen,
As I play with lambdas, I see many, many anomalies (like passing them, the
difference between execution and passing, re-assignments, etc.). I
remember you saying that you weren't intending to go down that rabbit hole.
They sever a useful function as they are. I respect your view.
Hi Blake,
that probably works more by chance than on purpose.
/// Jürgen
On 07/27/2014 06:56 PM, Blake McBride wrote:
∇test;fun1;fun2
[1] fun1←{1+⍵}
[2] fun1 22
[3] fun2←fun1
[4] fun2 44
[5] ∇
test
23
45
∇test;fun1;fun2
[1] fun1←{1+⍵}
[2] fun1 22
[3] fun2←fun1
[4] fun2 44
[5] ∇
test
23
45
