Re: [Bug-apl] Trace and Stop control

2014-06-14 Thread Juergen Sauermann
Hi, in ISO they are called ⎕STOP and ⎕TRACE. Both variants S∆/T∆ and ⎕STOP/⎕TRACE are now implemented n GNU APL. For some reason S∆ and T∆ are case sensitive while ⎕STOP and ⎕TRACE are not. /// Jürgen On 04/06/2014 09:56 AM, David B. Lamkins wrote: Oops. Never mind. That's an IBM-ism; not p

Re: [Bug-apl] Trace and Stop control

2014-04-06 Thread Juergen Sauermann
Hi David, I have put trace and stop control on my TODO list (aka. README-4-compliance). May take a while, though. /// Jürgen On 04/06/2014 09:56 AM, David B. Lamkins wrote: Oops. Never mind. That's an IBM-ism; not part of ISO APL. On Sat, 2014-04-05 at 23:20 -0700, David B. Lamkins wrote:

Re: [Bug-apl] Trace and Stop control

2014-04-06 Thread David B. Lamkins
Oops. Never mind. That's an IBM-ism; not part of ISO APL. On Sat, 2014-04-05 at 23:20 -0700, David B. Lamkins wrote: > A suggestion: > > For compatibility with APL2, reserve names beginning with t∆ and s∆. GNU > APL should indicate that trace and stop control are unimplemented when > attempting t

[Bug-apl] Trace and Stop control

2014-04-05 Thread David B. Lamkins
A suggestion: For compatibility with APL2, reserve names beginning with t∆ and s∆. GNU APL should indicate that trace and stop control are unimplemented when attempting to set such names to anything other than a numeric vector or an empty vector.