Re: [Bug-apl] One more info issue

2014-07-29 Thread David Lamkins
OK. Thanks for the pointer. On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 10:32 AM, Juergen Sauermann < juergen.sauerm...@t-online.de> wrote: > Hi David, > > it is not mentioned because GNU APL accepts ⍝! as a library marker (and > makes such libraries > readable by other APL interpreters because ⍝! is just an ordina

Re: [Bug-apl] One more info issue

2014-07-29 Thread Juergen Sauermann
Hi David, it is not mentioned because GNU APL accepts ⍝! as a library marker (and makes such libraries readable by other APL interpreters because ⍝! is just an ordinary APL comment) but such files will most likely not be understood by execve. So this is more a library convention and mentioned

[Bug-apl] One more info issue

2014-07-29 Thread David Lamkins
I'm not sure where it'd best be noted, but the info file makes no mention of alternatively starting a .apl file with the lamp-bang sequence. -- "The secret to creativity is knowing how to hide your sources." Albert Einstein http://soundcloud.com/davidlamkins http://reverbnation.com/lamkins h