Agreed. Thanks!
On Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at 8:51 AM, Juergen Sauermann <
juergen.sauerm...@t-online.de> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have changed the code so that ⎕PW is not copied when no objects are
> specified
> in the )COPY command, SVN
>
> As much as I like IBM APL2 compatibility there is a limit to it
Hi,
I have changed the code so that ⎕PW is not copied when no objects are
specified
in the )COPY command, SVN
As much as I like IBM APL2 compatibility there is a limit to it when it
begins
to make no sense anymore.
For example if I would say:
* )COPY some_WS A B ⎕PW*
then IBM APL2 wo
As I've stated before, I am not smart enough to understand that spec.
IBM's language manual is readable, and it is clear about how it works.
Also, I just tested IBM APL 2. It works as I describe.
On Tue, Jul 1, 2014 at 9:48 PM, Elias Mårtenson wrote:
> The standard spec is not entirely clear
The standard spec is not entirely clear on this, but the way I read it
suggests that everything it supposed to be copied.
Regards,
Elias
On 2 July 2014 09:58, Blake McBride wrote:
> According to the IBM APL2 Programming Language Reference (page 423), the
> )COPY command should not copy ⎕PW. T
According to the IBM APL2 Programming Language Reference (page 423), the
)COPY command should not copy ⎕PW. The manual states: "The only system
objects that can be copied are ⎕CT, ⎕FC, ⎕IO, ⎕LX, ⎕PP, ⎕PR, and ⎕RL.
Current GNU APL:
)CLEAR
CLEAR WS
⎕PW←80
)save ws1
2014-07-01 2