Re: [Bug-apl] A question about ⎕EA and ⎕EC

2014-05-18 Thread David Lamkins
Thank you. On May 18, 2014 11:17 AM, "Juergen Sauermann" wrote: > Hi David, > > thanks, should be fixed in SVN 274. > > /// Jürgen > > > On 05/18/2014 06:27 AM, David B. Lamkins wrote: > >> I want to make sure that I correctly understand ⎕EA and ⎕EC. Should >> these be able to clean up after fail

Re: [Bug-apl] A question about ⎕EA and ⎕EC

2014-05-18 Thread Juergen Sauermann
Hi David, thanks, should be fixed in SVN 274. /// Jürgen On 05/18/2014 06:27 AM, David B. Lamkins wrote: I want to make sure that I correctly understand ⎕EA and ⎕EC. Should these be able to clean up after failed execution of a defined function? What I'm seeing is that ⎕EA and ⎕EC perform as

Re: [Bug-apl] A question about ⎕EA and ⎕EC

2014-05-18 Thread Juergen Sauermann
Hi David, I am afraid that your understanding is correct. I will look into this. /// Jürgen On 05/18/2014 06:27 AM, David B. Lamkins wrote: I want to make sure that I correctly understand ⎕EA and ⎕EC. Should these be able to clean up after failed execution of a defined function? What I'm see

[Bug-apl] A question about ⎕EA and ⎕EC

2014-05-17 Thread David B. Lamkins
I want to make sure that I correctly understand ⎕EA and ⎕EC. Should these be able to clean up after failed execution of a defined function? What I'm seeing is that ⎕EA and ⎕EC perform as expected given an expression of variables and primitive functions (including expressions that fail to execute)