Thanks Jürgen,
I'd like to keep the situation i gave in my post using the ')copy fns.enz'
method as i do fns developement first in the apl ws then test it with apl
scripting then to the libapl program and using the apl_exec method you gave
would not be practicle.
could you give it an analysis
Hello Jürgen, Elias
The difference I mention is in
(1/3⊃V)←1
vs
(3⊃V)←1
The second expression is the one discussed in the Mail.
And I agree with your statement Jürgen that, even if not specified, your
solution is correct.
3⊃V is the third elemnt in V and that is being set to 1.
The first expr
I think this is because monadic ⊃ is first in Dyalog, as opposed to
disclose in GNU, APL2 (and, incidentally, KAP 😀).
Use monadic ↑ instead to get the effect you want.
Den ons 8 mars 2023 00:34Dr. Jürgen Sauermann
skrev:
> Hi Hans-Peter,
>
> I believe that GNU APL, Dyalog, and IBM APL2 only now
Hi Hans-Peter,
I believe that GNU APL, Dyalog, and IBM APL2 only now behave
the same while GNU APL did not before the fix:
TryAPL Version 3.6.1 (enter ]State for
details)
Tue Mar 07 2023 16:59:04
Copyright (c) Dyalog Limited 1982-
Hi enztec,
see below.
On 3/6/23 9:31 PM, enz...@gmx.com
wrote:
Hi
it doesn't seem possible to create apl fns with apl_command or apl_exec directly using libapl
This premiss seems wrong:
#include
// compile with:
