Hi Blake,
i am getting this:
* )clear**
**CLEAR WS**
** ∇abc**
**[1] 1**
**[2] 2**
**[3] 3**
**[4] [⎕]**
** ∇**
**[0] abc**
**[1] 1**
**[2] 2**
**[3] 3**
** ∇**
**[4] ∇*
I suppose that either your preferences file is wrong (e.g. wrong profile),
or not read: (c
Thanks!
I have: DISCARD-INDENTATION Yes
in my ~/.gnu-apl/preferences file, however:
∇abc
[1] 1
[2] 2
[3] 3
[4] [⎕]
∇
[0] abc
[1] 1
[2]2
[3]3
∇
[4] ∇
∇abc[⎕]∇
∇
[0] abc
[1] 1
[2]2
[3]3
∇
As you can see, th
Hi Blake
to conclude the discussion I made the following changes (SVN 1259):
1. ⎕CR will always remove unnecessary leading and trailing
spaces.
Unfortunately this deprives the fans of indentation of any
possibility
to obtain their loved indented ver
Hi Jürgen,
Thanks for your response! See mine below.
On Fri, Apr 10, 2020 at 7:31 AM Dr. Jürgen Sauermann <
mail@jürgen-sauermann.de> wrote:
> Hi Blake,
>
> see below.
>
> Jürgen
>
> On 4/10/20 1:34 PM, Blake McBride wrote:
>
> Hi Jürgen,
>
> Please see my response in-line below.
>
> On Fri, Ap
Hi Blake,
see below.
Jürgen
On 4/10/20 1:34 PM, Blake McBride
wrote:
Hi Jürgen,
Please see my response in-line below.
On Fri, Apr 10, 2020 at 5:07
Retaining a user's formatting may or may not be a good thing, but it's not
APL if it does so. Languages such as C, C++, Java, etc. are Algol-style
languages. They retain the user's format. APL is not.
On Fri, Apr 10, 2020 at 6:33 AM Elias Mårtenson wrote:
> Wrong may be an inappropriate word,
Hi Jürgen,
Please see my response in-line below.
On Fri, Apr 10, 2020 at 5:07 AM Dr. Jürgen Sauermann <
mail@jürgen-sauermann.de> wrote:
> Hi Blake,
>
> I see what you are after.
>
> You said earlier that you don't care how functions are stored externally.
> At the same time you want the intern
Wrong may be an inappropriate word, but I agree that it's a pretty stupid
thing to do. If a user formats the code in a certain way, I'd assume he
does it because he wants it that way.
It's one of the reasons I dislike Go. It automatically reformats your code
when compiling.
On Fri, 10 Apr 2020, 1
I know. And I believe it is wrong.
-- Jürgen
On 4/9/20 11:22 PM, Blake McBride wrote:
> I checked IBM APL2. They do what I am suggesting. See the attached
> screenshot.
>
> --blake
>