Hi,
thanks, good to know. My personal feeling is that Python
configuration is an
unportable mess. If I run python3-config, then I get:
pyenv:
python3-config: command not found
The `python3-config' command exists in these Py
I made it work but only with some works
Makefile.am from:
lib_gnu_apl_la_CXXFLAGS += -I/usr/include/python3.4m
to:
lib_gnu_apl_la_CXXFLAGS += `python3-config --includes`
then run: "autoreconf"
./configure --with-python
make -j4
sudo make install
then had to run
Hi Jürgen,
> Regarding fpc it depends on how they have built their C/C++ interface (if
> they did).
> The last time I used Pascal was the time when the only other programming
> language on my platform was BASIC. So I am not really up-to-date with Pascal.
> If you want to try it, then I can hel
the effort should be rather low. If you look at the Python
interface (file src/python_apl.cc)
then it has only 823 lines of C++ code. The python interface is a
re-write of libapl so I could
have used libapl to further reduce the code size. But I found it
Hi,
I haven't tried Python 2.7 but it may work. I followed the
instructions in
https://docs.python.org/3.3/c-api
I personally find Python 2.7 somewhat odd, so I never
considered it.
According to ./configure --help:
..
