Thanks you guys doing this )help is really appreciated- maybe I can make a
contribution too
line 13but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
; -> , for oxford comma?
references :
https://www.grammarly.com/blog/what-is-the-oxford-comma-and-why-do
Wanting to understand my ./configure options, for SVN 927,
I did ./configure --help, ./configure --help=short, and ./configure
--help=recursive.
Captured the output from all 3 and then did a diff on the logs of the short vs
the recursive.
There is no difference other than the values of --help.
Hi,
Sure here it is. Don't expect anything big in it - it is just a couple
of lines of text.
Help.def
Description: Binary data
enz...@gmx.com writes:
> Just a suggestion - why not also attach the full 'new' help.def and not just
> the
> patch - missing a patch would be disasterous ;)
>
> On
Just a suggestion - why not also attach the full 'new' help.def and not just
the patch - missing a patch would be disasterous ;)
On Fri, 21 Apr 2017 20:31:19 +0200
Alexey Veretennikov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Here is the patch for extended documentation for arithmetical functions
> +,-,×,÷,*
>
> Ple
Hi,
Here is the patch for extended documentation for arithmetical functions
+,-,×,÷,*
Please take a look and take a look at the output, if the format is ok.
If it is ok I'll continue to write extended documentation for other
functions/operators with examples.
Index: src/Help.def
Hi Louis,
I see. I overlooked that the first and third example were similar.
Fixed in SVN 927.
/// Jürgen
On 04/21/2017 09:48 AM, Louis de
Forcrand wrote:
The last one (at least IMO) should
The last one (at least IMO) should be positive and equal to the (correct)
result of the first of the three examples, because
9094863431 = 9094863431J0
Cheers,
Louis
> On 20 Apr 2017, at 18:43, Juergen Sauermann
> wrote:
>
> Hi Kacper,
>
> maybe, but the ISO standard says (function And/LCM on
