Re: [Bug-apl] compile error location of malloc.h

2016-08-28 Thread Christian Robert
agreed. Xtian. On 2016-08-29 02:02, Elias Mårtenson wrote: On 29 August 2016 at 13:58, Christian Robert mailto:christian.rob...@polymtl.ca>> wrote: On 2016-08-29 01:21, Elias Mårtenson wrote: They are, but if they are not found in the local directory, they are also searched for i

Re: [Bug-apl] compile error location of malloc.h

2016-08-28 Thread Elias Mårtenson
On 29 August 2016 at 13:58, Christian Robert wrote: > On 2016-08-29 01:21, Elias Mårtenson wrote: > >> They are, but if they are not found in the local directory, they are also >> searched for in the system directories. >> > > and if so, why did the compiler didn't find "malloc.h" ? was not at a

Re: [Bug-apl] compile error location of malloc.h

2016-08-28 Thread Christian Robert
On 2016-08-29 01:21, Elias Mårtenson wrote: They are, but if they are not found in the local directory, they are also searched for in the system directories. and if so, why did the compiler didn't find "malloc.h" ? was not at all in system defaults ? (don't know at all about OS X) I agree w

Re: [Bug-apl] compile error location of malloc.h

2016-08-28 Thread Elias Mårtenson
They are, but if they are not found in the local directory, they are also searched for in the system directories. That said, in this case using the angle brackets is the correct thing to use. On 29 August 2016 at 13:08, Christian Robert wrote: > that should read: > > #include > > or better > >

Re: [Bug-apl] compile error location of malloc.h

2016-08-28 Thread Christian Robert
that should read: #include or better #include things in double quotes are searched in local directory by default and not in system. Xtian. On 2016-08-28 23:42, Xiao-Yong Jin wrote: LApack.cc:21:20: fatal error: malloc.h: No such file or directory #include "malloc.h"

[Bug-apl] compile error location of malloc.h

2016-08-28 Thread Xiao-Yong Jin
LApack.cc:21:20: fatal error: malloc.h: No such file or directory #include "malloc.h" ^ compilation terminated. Under OS X, it’s in /usr/include/malloc/malloc.h Is it actually needed? The code compiles fine without the #include. Best, Xiao-Yong

[Bug-apl] Packager updated for GNU APL 1.6

2016-08-28 Thread David B. Lamkins
With the release of GNU APL 1.6, I thought that this would be a good time to update the APL Package Manager. https://github.com/TieDyedDevil/apl-pkg The big change here is that the development branch (percy) has been merged onto master. There are a lot of new features (see below). There won't b

Re: [Bug-apl] GNU APL 1.6 released

2016-08-28 Thread enztec
Nice - thanks - looks good - no configure or make problems and libapl.so looks great - no problem with previously written code native function for accessing PostgreSQL ... something very nice to play with (didn't see that before) --- Of cource the web page at http://www.gnu.org/software/a

[Bug-apl] GNU APL 1.6 released

2016-08-28 Thread Juergen Sauermann
Hi, I am happy to announce that GNU APL 1.6 has been released. This release contains: * bug fixes, * ⎕FIO (replaces FILE I>O native functions), and * local variables in lambdas All bugs reported b

Re: [Bug-apl] Nil result from ⌹

2016-08-28 Thread Kacper Gutowski
On 28 August 2016 at 14:02, Juergen Sauermann wrote: > I believe I managed to reduce the amount of memory needed for A⌹B > considerably. SVN 791. Great! Thanks. -k

Re: [Bug-apl] Nil result from ⌹

2016-08-28 Thread Juergen Sauermann
Hi again, I believe I managed to reduce the amount of memory needed for A⌹B considerably. SVN 791. /// Jürgen On 08/28/2016 12:05 PM, Juergen Sauermann wrote: Hi Kacper, thanks, fixed in

Re: [Bug-apl] Nil result from ⌹

2016-08-28 Thread Juergen Sauermann
Hi Kacper, thanks, fixed in SVN 790. You will now get a WS FULL because the computation of A⌹A needs a 9×9 matrix internally which is about 80 GB large for real and 160 GB for complex matrices. /// Jürgen

Re: [Bug-apl] New release?

2016-08-28 Thread Juergen Sauermann
Hi Blake, yes, I will do that. /// Jürgen On 08/27/2016 08:02 PM, Blake McBride wrote: Given all the great bug fixes, and the fact that it has been over a year since the last release, perhaps it is time

Re: [Bug-apl] Nil result from ⌹

2016-08-28 Thread Kacper Gutowski
On 28 August 2016 at 04:12, enztec wrote: > works here Perhaps it would fail if you tried bigger array? 9 seemed enough to reproduce it reliably in my environment. And no, this is a complete transcript, nothing else was defined. -k