Re: [Bug-apl] number precision in saved workspaces

2016-06-07 Thread Juergen Sauermann
Hi Xiao-Yong, OK - SVN 739. /// Jürgen On 06/07/2016 08:16 PM, Xiao-Yong Jin wrote: Hi Jürgen, Thanks, though the current behavior still does not give the exact number bit by bit. Can you change it to %.17g, or std:

Re: [Bug-apl] number precision in saved workspaces

2016-06-07 Thread Xiao-Yong Jin
Hi Jürgen, Thanks, though the current behavior still does not give the exact number bit by bit. Can you change it to %.17g, or std::numeric_limits::max_digits10? In addition, is it OK to raise the maximum allowed ⎕PP to 17? Best, Xiao-Yong > On Jun 7, 2016, at 12:37 PM, Juergen Sauermann >

Re: [Bug-apl] ⎕INP ignores parts of its input (Re: she bang script arguments)

2016-06-07 Thread Juergen Sauermann
Hi Kacper, it is intended that the end delimiter can be anywhere (and the rest of the shall be ignore then. But something seems to be still wrong in ⎕INP. I have improved it a little in SVN 738, but something may still be wrong. /// Jürge

Re: [Bug-apl] number precision in saved workspaces

2016-06-07 Thread Juergen Sauermann
Hi Xiao-Yong, thanks, fixed in SVN 738. /// Jürgen On 06/07/2016 08:13 AM, Xiao-Yong Jin wrote: Hello, Is the following behavior intended? Note the x value after load. )clear CLEAR WS x←.123456789012345

Re: [Bug-apl] axis specification with scalar dyadic functions (2)

2016-06-07 Thread Juergen Sauermann
Hi, thanks, fixed in SVN 737. /// Jürgen On 06/07/2016 05:51 AM, Christian Robert wrote: NARS2000 give: a←2 3⍴.1×⍳6 b←2 3⍴⍳6 a + b 1.1 2.2 3.3

Re: [Bug-apl] another dfun bug

2016-06-07 Thread Juergen Sauermann
Hi, thanks, fixed in SVN 736. Both assertions were caused by the same bug (introduced recently) /// Jürgen On 06/05/2016 09:35 AM, Christian Robert wrote: something similar,   )res