[Bug-apl] number precision in saved workspaces

2016-06-06 Thread Xiao-Yong Jin
Hello, Is the following behavior intended? Note the x value after load. )clear CLEAR WS x←.12345678901234567890 ⎕pp←16 x 0.1234567890123457 )wsid tmp WAS CLEAR WS )save tmp 2016-06-07 01:09:15 (GMT-5) )clear CLEAR WS )load tmp SAVED 2016-06-07 01:

Re: [Bug-apl] axis specification with scalar dyadic functions (2)

2016-06-06 Thread Christian Robert
NARS2000 give: a←2 3⍴.1×⍳6 b←2 3⍴⍳6 a + b 1.1 2.2 3.3 4.4 5.5 6.6 a+[1]b LENGTH ERROR a+[1]b ∧ a+[2]b LENGTH ERROR a+[2]b ∧ looks like something *I* do not yet master. Ah the newbies ... they talk, talk and it's just wind. Xtian. On 2016-06-06 23

Re: [Bug-apl] axis specification with scalar dyadic functions

2016-06-06 Thread Christian Robert
I agree, )sic a←2 3⍴.1×⍳6 b←2 3⍴⍳6 a + b 1.1 2.2 3.3 4.4 5.5 6.6 a+[1]b 1.1 1.2 1.3 4.4 4.5 4.6 ⍝ should give an error above, rank error. a+[2]b LENGTH ERROR a+[2]b ^^ ⍝ this is NOT ok ⎕io 1 my 2 cents, Xtian. On 2016-06

[Bug-apl] axis specification with scalar dyadic functions

2016-06-06 Thread Xiao-Yong Jin
Hi, I accidentally found this in gnu apl: (2 3⍴.1×⍳6)+[1]2 3⍴⍳6 1.1 1.2 1.3 4.4 4.5 4.6 I would expect a rank error. Bug or feature?

Re: [Bug-apl] she bang script arguments

2016-06-06 Thread Juergen Sauermann
Hi, yes, good idea. done in SVN 735. /// Jürgen On 06/05/2016 05:56 PM, Elias Mårtenson wrote: How about checking if argv[0] is "aplscript" and then run it as if --script had been given? That would allo