Hello, perhaps it’s another dfun bug.
)clear
CLEAR WS
∇z←x f y
[1] x{⍺ g ⍵}y
[2] →0
[3] ∇
items_allocated = 16
items[7] = 'yUSER-F2 λ1'xENDLVALUE3«0»→ENDL
idx = 7
==
Assertion failed: 0 && "Bad index"
in Func
I came up with this silly variant of APL-in-shell embedding:
#!/bin/sh
true ←⎕inp'#'
exec apl --script "$0" -- ${1+"$@"} #
)erase true
But I think there's something wrong with ⎕INP, actually.
In the example above, true is ⍬ (sic) just before erasing.
]BOXING 8
⎕INP "E"
AE
┌⊖┐
Hi Juergen,
Thanks for the script trick. The script in my previous email
works for all the cases when bash is in different places (your
bash script still requires /bin/bash which fails in *BSD, but
/usr/bin/env actually exists for all the systems I have). I
wanted to ask if it is OK for you to c
Hi Louis,
B←A
makes B
equivalent to A:
A←{(+⌿⍵)÷≢⍵}
B←A
⎕CR 'A'
λ←λ1 ⍵
λ←(+⌿⍵)÷≢⍵
⎕CR 'B'
λ←λ1 ⍵
λ←(+⌿⍵)÷≢⍵
That is not too useful unless you hav
I was just wondering what is supposed to happen if I do this:
A←{(+⌿⍵)÷≢⍵}
B←A
Is B equivalent to the lambda, or is it a function that calls A?
Or is this simply supposed to signal an error?
Louis
> On 01 Jun 2016, at 15:38, Juergen Sauermann
> wrote:
>
> Hi Xtian,
>
> thanks, fixed in SVN 73
Hi Xtian,
thanks, fixed in SVN 734.
All lambdas are now "unnamed" and assigning them to a name, like
in
A←{ ... }
does no longer change the name of the lambda (that was one of the
earlier problems)
Jürgen
