While `$ info apl` speaks to the issues around function/operator ambiguity, it
does not make any mention of the outer product case.
I suspect that the failure of "outer product expand" is an oversight. This case
is disambiguated by noticing the outer product during the right-to-left scan
that G
> On May 14, 2016, at 1:54 PM, Ala'a Mohammad wrote:
>
> Isn't it the same as using reshape instead?
>
> 3 0 2 ∘.⍴ 5 1 7
> 5 5 5 1 1 1 7 7 7
>
> 5 51 17 7
In this case, yes. If you have nested structure, no.
>
> Best,
>
> Ala'a
>
> On Sat, May 14, 2016 at 10:31 PM, Xiao-Yo
Isn't it the same as using reshape instead?
3 0 2 ∘.⍴ 5 1 7
5 5 5 1 1 1 7 7 7
5 51 17 7
Best,
Ala'a
On Sat, May 14, 2016 at 10:31 PM, Xiao-Yong Jin wrote:
>
>> On May 14, 2016, at 7:51 AM, David Tran wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Newbie study "MasteringDyalogAPL"; got error on pag
> On May 14, 2016, at 7:51 AM, David Tran wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Newbie study "MasteringDyalogAPL"; got error on page #388 example:
>
> 3 0 2 ∘./ 5 1 7
> SYNTAX ERROR
> 3 0 2∘./5 1 7
> ^ ^
>
> bug? ( or this is a specify feature of Dyalog and not APL2 ? )
It’s documented i
Hi Juergen,
Thanks for the prompt response.
How unfortunate, otherwise it will allow extending language's
terseness and allowing for more compact solutions.
Thanks again.
Regards,
Ala'a
On Sat, May 14, 2016 at 7:34 PM, Juergen Sauermann
wrote:
> Hi Ala,
>
> the allowed characters in variable
Hi,
Newbie study "MasteringDyalogAPL"; got error on page #388 example:
3 0 2 ∘./ 5 1 7
SYNTAX ERROR
3 0 2∘./5 1 7
^ ^
bug? ( or this is a specify feature of Dyalog and not APL2 ? )
my GNU APL is latest trunk version 1.5 / 726.
Thanks,
David
Hi,
I'm trying to define user functions using some unicode characters, but
gnu-apl complains about the characters used not being from the defined
acceptable set:
√ ← {⍵ ⋆ ÷2}
Unknown APL character: √ (U+221A)
Non-APL character
∛ ← {⍵ ⋆ ÷3}
Unknown APL character: ∛ (U+221B)
Non-APL charact
