While I agree that the right-operand binding should be as you have defined it (higher than vector notation), maybe I should take a queue from you and just always put parenthesis around the symbol and both operator inputs, which would free me of having to remember binding strengths, which may vary f
I haven't tested yet, but your description sounds perfectly workable to me.
Thanks!
Blake
Sent via the Samsung Galaxy Note® 4, an AT&T 4G LTE smartphone
Original message
From: Juergen Sauermann
Date: 2/8/2016 8:32 AM (GMT-06:00)
To: Blake McBride , bug-apl@gnu.org
Hi Blake,
thanks, sort of fixed in SVN 694. It may not work
properly, though, if a file
was not )DUMPed or modified manually after )DUMPing
it. Reason: DUMP
files contain APL code that is being executed. Therefore it is in
general not
deci
FYI Dyalog are considering introducing Cut into a future version of
Dyalog APL and would welcome feedback or collaboration on the design:
http://video.dyalog.com/Dyalog15/?v=9KOto3xXS3c
http://www.dyalog.com/uploads/conference/dyalog15/presentations/D16_Future_Operator_Proposals.zip
http://www.dya
Hi Alex,
it is not available in GNU APL. There have been many improvement
proposals for APL
over the years, but many of them have not made it into the ISO standard
(which is GNU
APL's implementation blueprint).
By literals I mean explicit values like *1 2 3 *or *(1 2) 'abc' *or *42*
as oppos
