I think the problem is incorrect parsing. Note that there is no space between between the 'x' and the first '5'. you can also get a segfault if you use ⎕nc and a similar syntax. Its weird because ⎕nc5 and ⎕ex5 result in Domain errors as expected. It looks like the stack trace for both these functio
Hi,
the stack trace (or segfault on some systems) should be fixed in SVN
640.
While ISO proposes domain error, APL2 actually returns 0 instead (and
so does GNU APL).
I'll leave it that way.
Thanks,
Jürgen
On Sat, Jun 20, 2015 at 12:32 PM, Louis Chretien wrote:
> I agree the error message should not be as dire as a segfault, but the basic
> intent seems dubious…
There's nothing inherently wrong with this. Argument of ⎕EX should
be a character array with rows containing identifiers (possibly padded
Why would you want to EXpunge an expression? Isn’t Quad-EX used to delete APL
objects?
The APL2 manual states that the argument should be the name of an APL object in
quotes.
I agree the error message should not be as dire as a segfault, but the basic
intent seems dubious…
> On 2015-06-20, a
