Re: [Bug-apl] Question on ")si"

2015-05-16 Thread Christian Robert
Juergen , You did exactly the reverse of what I was expecting, but, as usual, you did the *right* thing ;-) thanks for fixing this, Xtian. On 2015-05-16 08:47, Juergen Sauermann wrote: Hi Xtian, they are added because IBM APL2 adds them as well. However, I made immediate execution (what y

Re: [Bug-apl] Question on ")si"

2015-05-16 Thread Juergen Sauermann
Hi Xtian, they are added because IBM APL2 adds them as well. However, I made immediate execution (what you enter after the prompt) resumable in SVN 630. I believe the description of →⍳0 in the IBM APL2 language reference differs slightly