while this continue to work as designed:
D←{24 ⎕cr ⍵}
D ∆length
┌2┐
│┌5┐
┌13───
D temp
┌32─┐
│1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0│
└───┘
D bitsidx
┌5─┐
│28 29 30 31 32│
└──┘
bitsidx⊃temp
D
Definitely a bug!
On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 8:14 PM, Christian Robert <
christian.rob...@polymtl.ca> wrote:
> 132.207.4.11
> 132.207 0.4 0.11
> 24 ⎕cr 132.207.4.11
> ┌3───┐
> │132.207 0.4 0.11│
> └┘
>
>
> Well, is it a bug or not, I don't know really. Was ty
132.207.4.11
132.207 0.4 0.11
24 ⎕cr 132.207.4.11
┌3───┐
│132.207 0.4 0.11│
└┘
Well, is it a bug or not, I don't know really. Was typing an IP address.
Xtian.
Hi Fausto et al,
I believe I have fixed the header problem by relaxing the rules for
header variables.
Some quick tests with IBM APL2 seem to show that APL2 is very
relaxed regarding this. For example
you can use the same label twice in a function, or have t
Hi Blake,
yes, sorry. You see that I'm a C++ guy after all :-) .
/// Jürgen
On 04/24/2015 08:52 PM, Blake McBride
wrote:
Would't you have to declare it as follows in order
for that to work?
And then, of course, do this as line 1:
*∆**←**∆1*
*Blake McBride*
www.arahant.com
Cell: 615-394-6760
On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 1:52 PM, Blake McBride wrote:
> Would't you have to declare it as follows in order for that to work?
>
> * ∆←∆xl ∆1*
>
> *Blake McBride*
>
> www.arahant.com
> Cell
Would't you have to declare it as follows in order for that to work?
* ∆←∆xl ∆1*
*Blake McBride*
www.arahant.com
Cell: 615-394-6760
On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 1:40 PM, Juergen Sauermann <
juergen.sauerm...@t-online.de> wrote:
> Hi Fausto,
>
> the *DOMAIN ERROR* is cause by the following func
Hi Fausto,
the DOMAIN ERROR is cause by the following function
header:
∆←∆xl ∆
Currently GNU APL rejects function headers with duplicate symbols.
IBM APL2 seems to accept duplicate names in the header, but the
rules about
On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 7:23 PM, Juergen Sauermann
wrote:
> Now, ATF files are what )IN and )OUT read resp, produce. Chances are that
> those
> ATF files are the same as for IBM APL2. In that case all you need is to
> write them in Dyalog and read them back into GNU APL using command )IN.
I remem
Hi Jürgen,
unfortunately Dyalog supports only extended format (as export format) not ATF...
So I need XFRPC workspace to read such format.
I found an APLX version of XFRPC, so I read it in APLX then exported
in ATF (with )OUT command... APLX supports ATF! YEAH! :) )
But when I try to load the AT
Hi Fausto,
maybe you are lucky. The wiki page says:
"2. Using fixed record length ATF files"
Now, ATF files are what )IN and )OUT read
resp, produce. Chances are that those
ATF files are the same as for IBM APL2. In that case all you
need is
Hello Blake,
thanks, maybe this could be useful with Dyalog...
regards,
Fausto
2015-04-24 18:31 GMT+02:00 Blake McBride :
> From years ago, I remember an APL workspace that enabled a standard
> interchange format between various APL's. For example, if I remember
> correctly, one of the first t
Hello Jürgen,
thanks for the clarification.
I found this page http://aplwiki.com/Transfer%20code and it's talking
about APL2000 and others vendors, so I hope to find something similar
with GNU-APL and Dyalog.
Dyalog supports ]OUT and it generates a XWD file (extended file, not ATF).
So I'm wonder
>From years ago, I remember an APL workspace that enabled a standard
interchange format between various APL's. For example, if I remember
correctly, one of the first things it did was include quad-AV. It then
used this to map everything else. I may have a copy of this if anyone is
interested. (
Hi Fausto,
I believe workspace files are generally not exchangeable between
different APL interpreters.
In some cases there are commands that allow the exchange of
workspaces. For example )IN and )OUT
would allow the exchange of workspaces betw
Hello all,
I'm trying to used the workspace XFRPC11.w3 (downloaded from APL wiki)
in order to transfer file from Dyalog APL to GNU-APL.
When I try to load XFRPC11 I have an internal error.
I suppose the 'w3' format is only for APL2000... correct ?
Is there a way to use such method with GNU-APL
17 matches
Mail list logo
