On 2015-03-17 06:42, Juergen Sauermann wrote:
Hi Xtian,
it looks like you are using the multi-core feature of GNU APL.
As *README-8-parallel* says: *Parallel execution is currently experimental*.
I have seen core dumps like those earlier when multi-core was enabled, but have
not found the reas
Don't look further, I've found why it core dump.
If I run it like this:
Time '⊣ z←⍳1000'
Time[4] SYLGet
Time[5] SYLSet
Time[9] →⍬
Time[10] 1
Time[12] 0
Time[13] 1
Time[14] 1
Time[15] 1
Time[19] 1
Time[20] 17 20 16 13 680
Time[21] 0
Time[22] 17 20 16 13 883
Time[23] 1
Time[27] →29
Time[
Nope, without "Parallel" it still core dump.
Xtian.
__ _ __ __ _____ __
/ // | / // / / / / | / __ \ / /
/ / __ / |/ // / / / / /| | / /_/ // /
/ /_/ // /| // /_/ / / ___ | / // /
Hi Xtian,
for me it would be much easier if the problem could be reproduced
without multi-core.
According to gdb the crash happens in the practically
empty PrintBuffer::PrintBuffer() constructor.
BTW: Shouldn't it be Xian rather than Xtian?
Xtian is an abbrev of Christian, "Chris" a cross or crussifixion , "X" + tian
On 2015-03-17 12:51, Juergen Sauermann wrote:
Hi Xtian,
for me it would be much easier if the problem could be reproduced without
multi-core.
According to *gdb* the crash happens in the practically empty
P*rintBuf
It's not work, it's pure pleasure !
Xtian.
On 2015-03-17 07:14, Juergen Sauermann wrote:
Hi Xtian,
thanks. fixed in *SVN 565*.
Don't work that late!
/// Jürgen
On 03/17/2015 03:01 AM, Christian Robert wrote:
)load Util
SAVED 2015-03-17 -3:23:11 (GMT-4)
^^
the first two li
That code "only" crash when "traced" with T∆Time.
It work perfectly well (never crash) without the trace.
To me it seams it crash at the "⍎what" statement or when it return from it's
execution.
I will recompile "without" multi-core to see it it's related or not ...
Xtian.
On 2015-03-17 06:42,
Hi Xtian,
thanks. fixed in SVN 565.
Don't work that late!
/// Jürgen
On 03/17/2015 03:01 AM, Christian
Robert wrote:
)load Util
SAVED 2015-03-17 -3:23:11 (GMT-4)
^
Hi Xtian,
it looks like you are using the multi-core feature of GNU APL.
As README-8-parallel says: Parallel execution is
currently experimental.
I have seen core dumps like those earlier when multi-core was
enabled, but have not found the re
