Hmmm interesting… I don't think that would be too hard to do.
Thanks for the idea. I'll check it out tomorrow.
Peter
On 2014-08-11, at 9:37 PM, Blake McBride wrote:
> Dear Peter,
>
> I think the GNU APL layout differs a little from the Dyalog layout. It would
> be nice for your Mac setup
Dear Peter,
I think the GNU APL layout differs a little from the Dyalog layout. It
would be nice for your Mac setup to match the output of the GNU APL ]ketb
command. That is what I did with my layout files.
I used the Mac primarily for several years. I had a problem with my
motherboard. While
Thanks Blake - added that one.
When you say keyboard definitions I interpret that to mean for use with xkbcomp.
Since it is not part of a standard OS X install and requires running X I
decided to go with Apple's use of XML.
Furthermore that's what Dyalog has done.
Also Readme-3 in the keyboard se
Greetings:
I like your new web site and that we can now download the OS X
DyalogAlt.keylayout from the site. Well done.
However the file that you have linked to is earlier than your previous one.
The currently posted layout dated 2011-04-13 at 16:09 (GMT +1:00) (edited by
Ukelele version 2.1.5)
Dear Peter,
χ is U03C7
The keyboard definitions I supplied included all of the characters used by
GNU APL.
Thanks.
Blake
On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 4:21 PM, Peter Teeson
wrote:
> Hi Blake:
> In your email of 5 Aug your mentioned the following missing mappings in
> the apl.xmodmap.
>
> χ ⍹ ⍶
Hi Blake:
In your email of 5 Aug your mentioned the following missing mappings in the
apl.xmodmap.
> χ ⍹ ⍶ ⍷ ⍨ ¥ ⍸ ⍣ ⌷ ⍥ ¢ £ ⍙
The DyalogAlt.keylayout for OS X dated 2011-09-29 at 14:26 (GMT +1:00) (edited
by Ukelele version 2.1.7)
contains the following in the Shift + Alt plane
> ⍷ ⍨ ⍸ ⍣ ⌷ ⍥
The currently posted layout dated 2011-04-13 at 16:09 (GMT +1:00) (edited by
Ukelele version 2.1.5)
has does not have the glyphs that were in a later version (which was the one
previously posted)
dated 2011-09-29 at 14:26 (GMT +1:00) (edited by Ukelele version 2.1.7)
The missing glyphs are in
Hi,
I have revised the algorithm for binomials. It should now return
integers where possible. SVN 432.
/// Jürgen
On 08/07/2014 08:00 AM, Frederick H. Pitts wrote:
Elias,
Juergen informed me that he had changed how monadic ! is calculated in
in a reply with the above subject line.
