Ah, I didn't realize I was so far behind. Thanks for the heads-up! :)
On Sun, 2014-05-04 at 08:20 +0800, Elias Mårtenson wrote:
> This was just fixed, actually. You might want to try with the latest
> version. It should work now.
>
> Regards,
> Elias
>
> On 4 May 2014 02:45, "David B. Lamkins
This was just fixed, actually. You might want to try with the latest
version. It should work now.
Regards,
Elias
On 4 May 2014 02:45, "David B. Lamkins" wrote:
> I was able to get a core dump of the segfault caused by attempting to
> )load an APL file with Emacs mode active.
>
> [dlamkins@morgan
Greetings,
While using Emacs mode I found the following small bug. If you edit an
existing function, move the cursor around, maybe change something, and hit
C-c C-c it saves the function just fine. However, if you edit an existing
function and then immediately (without moving the cursor or chang
Sigh…..
Tracking down something in nabla I decided to start absolutely clean and did a
new SVN checkout.
I did the usual ./configure followed by make and got this:
…..
Undefined symbols for architecture x86_64:
"_libintl_bindtextdomain", referenced from:
_main in apl-main.o
"_libintl_get
I was able to get a core dump of the segfault caused by attempting to
)load an APL file with Emacs mode active.
[dlamkins@morganthe ~]$ gdb `which apl` -c core.2134
GNU gdb (GDB) Fedora 7.6.50.20130731-19.fc20
Copyright (C) 2013 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
License GPLv3+: GNU GPL version 3 or
On Sat, 2014-05-03 at 14:22 +0800, Elias Mårtenson wrote:
> As much as I am a fan of extensions, I have to admit that I don't
> fully understand the justification for this. After all, the
> pkg-commands are plain functions, so why not expose them as such?
The short answer is that some tasks seem m
On Sat, 2014-05-03 at 15:02 +0200, Juergen Sauermann wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> from what I hear Dyalog APL seems to be a good interpreter and I have no
> problem with it.
> I am only a little more conservative when it comes to new and
> non-standard APL features.
> But Peter Teeson had ideas going
Hi Jürgen:
..GNUAPL/apl-svn/src/Logging.cc:32:11: Enumeration values 'LID_NONE' and
'LID_MAX' not handled in switch
..GNUAPL/apl-svn/src/Logging.cc:42:11: Enumeration values 'LID_NONE' and
'LID_MAX' not handled in switch
..GNUAPL/apl-svn/src/Logging.cc:47:1: Control may reach end of non-void func
Hi David,
from what I hear Dyalog APL seems to be a good interpreter and I have no
problem with it.
I am only a little more conservative when it comes to new and
non-standard APL features.
But Peter Teeson had ideas going into a similar direction.
One question that I have is how the implement
Any ideas on a next step for this?
Thanks!
Blake
On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 1:09 PM, Juergen Sauermann <
juergen.sauerm...@t-online.de> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> so the last we see in Input.cc is:
>
> *prompt: ' ' at Input.cc:223
>
> and then we call start_input(). That is a callback in
10 matches
Mail list logo
