Hello David,
You misunderstood (or more likely, I wan't very clear about) what I meant
about the job construction. I was merely using the EACH operator together
with a lambda to illustrate the different ways a simple expression such as
*1+2×A* can be decomposed.
My first example illustrates how s
Hi,
seems like the parent closes stdin/cin. Have to find out why.
/// Jürgen
On 03/10/2014 05:01 PM, baruc...@gmx.com wrote:
Hi,
I tried to figure out how to enable the daemon mode and how to use it,
but with no success; first of all, does it work? Each time I try to
enable it, I have an inf
That's a good analysis of the larger landscape, Elias. Thanks for posting.
I intend to avoid many of those issues by working on the (I think)
simplest case of scalar functions that don't reshape the result. That
obviously doesn't help with the more general cases...
Regarding your first example of
Hi,
I tried to figure out how to enable the daemon mode and how to use it,
but with no success; first of all, does it work? Each time I try to
enable it, I have an infinite loop with the )OFF message.
Regards,
--
Thomas Baruchel
This is something that I have been thinking about as well. And the thing
that mostly concerns me is how multiple operations can be optimised. Part
of that thinking is actually part of my idea to keep track of temporary
objects so that they can be modified in-place. The core of that was already
impl
Hi,
I have added a --safe command line option that disables shared variables,
native functions, and the )HOST command. SVN 160.
/// Jürgen
On 03/10/2014 12:45 PM, Elias Mårtenson wrote:
I can set it up for testing purposes. I already have some servers
available.
Would it be possible to ad
Hi Elias,
thanks, fixed in SVN 160.
/// Jürgen
On 03/09/2014 05:46 PM, Elias Mårtenson wrote:
After some playing around, I just decided to type an opening and
closing paren:
*()*
I then got the following error (trying again after restarting will not
reproduce the error):
Assert
Hi,
yes, I can add a --safe command line option. Shared variables can
already be disabled with --noSV.
/// Jürgen
On 03/10/2014 12:45 PM, Elias Mårtenson wrote:
I can set it up for testing purposes. I already have some servers
available.
Would it be possible to add a flag that enables "
Hi David,
I think your ideas are correct. I have planned multicore support for GNU
APL 1.4 and
every help is welcome.
Actually parallel processing was one of the main reasons for me to write
GNU APL.
I published a Ph.D thesis "A parallel APL computer" (in German) back in
1990. We had
built a
I can set it up for testing purposes. I already have some servers
available.
Would it be possible to add a flag that enables "safe mode"? This would
restrict the availability of shared variables and native functions?
Regards,
Elias
On 10 Mar 2014 19:19, "Juergen Sauermann"
wrote:
> Hi Thomas,
>
Hi Thomas,
nice idea, we should try that.
I believe that it should already be possible to start
GNU APL from eg. an apache web-server; the missing
piece could be the backward direction (user input -> webserver).
Security should not be too hard on linux systems.
A problem remaining is where to
11 matches
Mail list logo
