Hi Elias,
yes, it would make sense. I have added dyadic ∪ (union) and diadic ∩
(intersection), see SVN 157.
/// Jürgen
On 03/06/2014 10:27 AM, Elias Mårtenson wrote:
Would it make sense to implement the ∩ function in GNU APL? In Dyalog,
it represents the intersection function which returns
Hello!
First, thank you for the nice explanation in my absence. I couldn't have
done it better. Let me just explain where I see things a little
differently.
Tobia Conforto
writes:
> Even the classic example of a fork (+/÷≡) is harder to read than its
> functional version {(+/⍵)÷≡⍵} and it goes
Hey,
I noticed (in GNU APL 1.2) that I did not get readline to work.
I tried using "./configure --with-readline" to force Readline to be used,
but that informed me it was not found (Though it was installed, including
development packages).
After looking at the config.log, it turned out it was act
Hello!
Juergen Sauermann
writes:
> I see, thanks for the explanation.
Thanks from me too. He explained it better than I would probably have.
Tobia Conforto
writes:
> I would be wary of bracket notation on the rank operator, because it
> has a different meaning in Nars2000 (which I'm not sure
I think treating the lambdas just like any function is perfectly normal,
and is exactly what any function languages does.
Now, functional languages also has lexical closures, but I'm not sure how
easy it would be to take advantage of it, since APL programs usually
doesn't take advantage of clearly
Hi,
in GNU APL you can have lambdas without result (eg. {}) and they don't
start with *λ*←.
As Kacper has pointed out you can also have user-defined functions
starting with *λ*←.
I have no plans to prevent that, but I have also no idea where the
lambdas will bring us
in GNU APL. Right now {
Hi Elias,
I have added macro sf_def() which gives the missing system functions,
SVN 155.
Alternatively you may go for Id.def (which is all symbols known by the
system)
and check if the UCS_string returned by id_name() starts with ⎕.
/// Jürgen
On 03/06/2014 09:07 AM, Elias Mårtenson wrot
Hi Tobia,
I see, thanks for the explanation.
I will look into this, but can't promise too much short term because
it probably requires some rework of the parser.
/// Jürgen
On 03/06/2014 01:27 AM, Tobia Conforto wrote:
Hi Juergen
how does NARS2000 define f⍤B and A f⍤B (the standard does no
>> Even the classic example of a fork (+/÷≡) is harder to read than its
>> functional version {(+/⍵)÷≡⍵} and it goes downhill from there with longer
>> trains. But maybe it's just me being unfamiliar with the syntax.
>
>
> Did you intend to use ⍴ instead of ≡ there? I can't see how {(+/⍵)÷≡⍵} could
Would it make sense to implement the ∩ function in GNU APL? In Dyalog, it
represents the intersection function which returns the elements that occur
in both L and R.
Regards,
Elias
It doesn't work correctly yet. SystemVariable.def doesn't give me all
symbols. For example, ⎕DL is not included. How can I get those too?
Regards,
Elias
On 4 March 2014 00:11, Elias Mårtenson wrote:
> And it's done. There is now expansion of both system commands and quad
> functions in the Ema
You are right of course. Thanks. :-)
Regards,
Elias
On 5 March 2014 02:00, Juergen Sauermann wrote:
> Hi Elias,
>
> I believe it would be more confusing if ⎕CR is sometimes computed and
> sometimes not.
>
> The example below might be easy to detect but what about cases like Z←8
> ⎕CR xxx ◊ Z o
12 matches
Mail list logo
