Re: [Bug-apl] Can anything be done about the mailer's choice of encoding?

2014-02-04 Thread David Lamkins
That's true: I am subscribed to the digest. (Reading it in Gmail and Evolution; no difference among clients...) I'll switch to individual delivery for now. Thanks for the hint. :) On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 11:30 PM, Elias Mårtenson wrote: > He seems to be using the email digests. It's possible th

Re: [Bug-apl] Can anything be done about the mailer's choice of encoding?

2014-02-04 Thread Elias Mårtenson
He seems to be using the email digests. It's possible that the digest feature doesn't take encoding into account. That wouldn't surprise me given how old and unmaintained the listserv software is. Regards, Elias On 5 February 2014 15:28, Jay Foad wrote: > The emails I get are full of beautiful

Re: [Bug-apl] Can anything be done about the mailer's choice of encoding?

2014-02-04 Thread Jay Foad
The emails I get are full of beautifully rendered APL. Maybe it's a problem with your mail client? I'm reading them in Gmail. Jay. On 5 February 2014 05:44, David B. Lamkins wrote: > I'd really like to follow bug-apl via email, except that the mailer > doesn't seem to grok Unicode. All non-ASCII

[Bug-apl] Can anything be done about the mailer's choice of encoding?

2014-02-04 Thread David B. Lamkins
I'd really like to follow bug-apl via email, except that the mailer doesn't seem to grok Unicode. All non-ASCII characters get replaced with a `?'. Looking at the headers, I see (excerpted): ... From: bug-apl-requ...@gnu.org Subject: Bug-apl Digest, Vol 6, Issue 4 To: bug-apl@gnu.org Reply-To: bu

Re: [Bug-apl] Strange behaviour of ,/

2014-02-04 Thread Kacper Gutowski
On 2014-02-04 12:17:16, Elias Mårtenson wrote: > When I look at the result from ,/1 > 2 3 it looks like an array that contains a single element: another array with > the values 1 2 3 in it. But it isn't. Technically you aren't wrong at all, it IS an array that contains a single element. But one-e

Re: [Bug-apl] Strange behaviour of ,/

2014-02-04 Thread Jay Foad
On 4 February 2014 04:17, Elias Mårtenson wrote: > Thank you. This made me aware of the fact that I still don't understand > this. You are right that the rank is zero, shown by the fact that ⍴,/1 2 3 > returns an empty result: > > 8⎕CR ⍴,/1 2 3 > ┌⊖┐ > │0│ > └─┘ > > > Can you explain to me w