[quoted lines by Samuel Thibault on 2016/02/07 at 00:25 +0100]
>Ok, I see that it shares the same glyph for U+0x and U+0x0020.
>Perhaps brltty gets confused by this. Dave, any idea?
For any given glyph, brltty uses the first one in the map. My guess, therefore,
is that the font is defined wi
Dave Mielke, on Mon 08 Feb 2016 18:53:26 -0500, wrote:
> [quoted lines by Samuel Thibault on 2016/02/07 at 00:25 +0100]
> >Ok, I see that it shares the same glyph for U+0x and U+0x0020.
> >Perhaps brltty gets confused by this. Dave, any idea?
>
> For any given glyph, brltty uses the first one
[quoted lines by Samuel Thibault on 2016/02/09 at 01:00 +0100]
>> For any given glyph, brltty uses the first one in the map. My guess,
>> therefore,
>> is that the font is defined with NUL as the main character and space as an
>> alias for it.
>
>Which is unfortunate, but probably happens not s
[quoted lines by Didier Spaier on 2016/02/07 at 00:09 +0100]
>Additional information: Philippe also tested an installer shipping
>brtty 5.3.1 and observed the same behavior.
Are you able to verify a fix if I were to post a patch to 5.3.1 for testing?
--
Dave Mielke | 2213 Fox Crescen
Dave Mielke, on Mon 08 Feb 2016 19:09:36 -0500, wrote:
> [quoted lines by Samuel Thibault on 2016/02/09 at 01:00 +0100]
> >> For any given glyph, brltty uses the first one in the map. My guess,
> >> therefore,
> >> is that the font is defined with NUL as the main character and space as an
> >> a
[quoted lines by Samuel Thibault on 2016/02/09 at 01:21 +0100]
>Perhaps a rule of thumb would be to take the character which has the
>lowest unicode value.
:-) That's our current problem. 0X00 < 0X20
--
Dave Mielke | 2213 Fox Crescent | The Bible is the very Word of God.
Phone: 1-613-
On 09/02/2016 01:20, Dave Mielke wrote:
> [quoted lines by Didier Spaier on 2016/02/07 at 00:09 +0100]
>
>> Additional information: Philippe also tested an installer shipping
>> brtty 5.3.1 and observed the same behavior.
>
> Are you able to verify a fix if I were to post a patch to 5.3.1 for testi
[quoted lines by Didier Spaier on 2016/02/09 at 03:46 +0100]
>> Are you able to verify a fix if I were to post a patch to 5.3.1 for testing?
>
>Indirectly, yes. I will make a package and send it to Philippe so he
>can test it.
I decided to go ahead and commit what I believe is the correct fix. Pl
Hello!
Dave Mielke writes:
> [quoted lines by Samuel Thibault on 2016/02/09 at 01:21 +0100]
> >Perhaps a rule of thumb would be to take the character which has the
> >lowest unicode value.
> :-) That's our current problem. 0X00 < 0X20
I would have preferred modifying the braille table of OP
