Re: [BRLTTY] brltty for MSDOS

2014-05-11 Thread Jason White
timothyho...@seznam.cz wrote: > I'd be interested to know why you are running DOS. Is there a DOS only > program that you need? Or are you just interested? Also, you can emulate it or run it virtualized under a better operating system if you wish. You can then run BRLTTY under the host operating

Re: [BRLTTY] brltty for MSDOS

2014-05-11 Thread acollins
Hello all. I'm running dos version 6.20 because there are two dos only programs that I own, which I want to access. For dos, I'm running asap, which in my opinion is the best screen reader ever written for dos. The two programs I want Braille access to are the online Bible program for dos, and t

Re: [BRLTTY] brltty for MSDOS

2014-05-11 Thread Dave Mielke
[quoted lines by acoll...@icsmail.net on 2014/05/10 at 23:19 -0500] >I'm running a dual boot machine running Linux and MSDOS >6.20. I'm not running dosemu, but a stand alone version of DOS. Before >I go to the trouble of corss compiling the gcc compiler for DOS, I'd >like to know if anyone has a

Re: [BRLTTY] brltty for MSDOS

2014-05-11 Thread acollins
Hello Dave. The only zip files I found on the download page were files like brltty-win-4.4-1.zip. I assume that requires windows, which is not what I'm looking for. Gene > >Yes, there are precompiled binaries of brltty for DOS. If you go to brltty's >download page, you'll find names like brltty

Re: [BRLTTY] brltty for MSDOS

2014-05-11 Thread Dave Mielke
[quoted lines by acoll...@icsmail.net on 2014/05/11 at 13:00 -0500] >The only zip files I found on the download page were files like >brltty-win-4.4-1.zip. I assume that requires windows, which is not what I'm >looking for. Yes, those are for Windows. You're right that the DOS files aren't sho

Re: [BRLTTY] brltty for MSDOS

2014-05-11 Thread acollins
Got it! Thanks Dave. >[quoted lines by acoll...@icsmail.net on 2014/05/11 at 13:00 -0500] > >>The only zip files I found on the download page were files like >>brltty-win-4.4-1.zip. I assume that requires windows, which is not what I'm >>looking for. > >Yes, those are for Windows. You're right