[BRLTTY] Problem with the new version.

2008-01-12 Thread Fabrizio Marini
Hi everybody, I'm an Ubuntu Gutsy user. I installed the new version of brltty (3.9) via apt-get, from the repository owned by Luke Yelavich (ppa.launchpad.net, I guess). When rebooting after installation, I noticed that I cannot access a text terminal window anymore: pressing ctrl+alt+f1 causes t

Re: [BRLTTY] brltty on powerpc

2008-01-12 Thread Luke Yelavich
On Sat, Jan 12, 2008 at 11:53:20AM EST, Samuel Thibault wrote: > Luke Yelavich, le Sat 12 Jan 2008 11:46:34 +1100, a écrit : > > Ok, the patch, which was the original one that Samuel posted to the list, > > did not make a difference. > > Could you send us a copy of your /dev/vcsa1 and of the brlt

Re: [BRLTTY] brltty on powerpc

2008-01-12 Thread Dave Mielke
[quoted lines by Luke Yelavich on 2008/01/13 at 10:18 +1100] >This is a version of brltty with the patch that you originally posted to the >list. Have you tried with the latest brltty source? -- Dave Mielke | 2213 Fox Crescent | I believe that the Bible is the Phone: 1-613-726-0014 |

Re: [BRLTTY] brltty on powerpc

2008-01-12 Thread Luke Yelavich
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sun, Jan 13, 2008 at 10:30:22AM EST, Dave Mielke wrote: > Have you tried with the latest brltty source? I intend to do just that very shortly. - -- Luke Yelavich GPG key: 0xD06320CE (http://www.themuso.com/themuso-gpg-key.txt) Email & MSN

Re: [BRLTTY] brltty on powerpc

2008-01-12 Thread Luke Yelavich
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sun, Jan 13, 2008 at 10:42:13AM EST, Luke Yelavich wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Sun, Jan 13, 2008 at 10:30:22AM EST, Dave Mielke wrote: > > Have you tried with the latest brltty source? > > I intend to do just th

Re: [BRLTTY] brltty on powerpc

2008-01-12 Thread Samuel Thibault
Luke Yelavich, le Sun 13 Jan 2008 12:24:25 +1100, a écrit : > On Sun, Jan 13, 2008 at 10:42:13AM EST, Luke Yelavich wrote: > > On Sun, Jan 13, 2008 at 10:30:22AM EST, Dave Mielke wrote: > > > Have you tried with the latest brltty source? > > > > I intend to do just that very shortly. > > Ok, seem

Re: [BRLTTY] brltty on powerpc

2008-01-12 Thread Dave Mielke
[quoted lines by Luke Yelavich on 2008/01/13 at 12:24 +1100] >Ok, seems like latest SVN works perfectly. Thanks for the test. -- Dave Mielke | 2213 Fox Crescent | I believe that the Bible is the Phone: 1-613-726-0014 | Ottawa, Ontario | Word of God. Please contact me EMail: [EMAIL P

Re: [BRLTTY] brltty on powerpc

2008-01-12 Thread Cheryl Homiak
Thanks for testing this, Luke. I'm thrilled to know that it now works so I know I'll be able to use it when it gets incorporated into the debian installation media. -- Cheryl "Where your treasure is, there will your heart be also." >> ___ This

[BRLTTY] Baum routing keys

2008-01-12 Thread Samuel Thibault
Hello, I got the basics of Baum working in qemu: detection + character display. I'm giving a try at routing keys, but there's a line in the driver that I don't understand: resetKeyGroup(packet.data.values.routingKeys, cellCount, packet.data.values.routingKey); packet.data.values.routingKeys ad

Re: [BRLTTY] Baum routing keys

2008-01-12 Thread Dave Mielke
[quoted lines by Samuel Thibault on 2008/01/13 at 05:26 +] >I'm giving a try at routing keys, but there's a line in the driver that >I don't understand: > >resetKeyGroup(packet.data.values.routingKeys, cellCount, >packet.data.values.routingKey); > >packet.data.values.routingKeys ad routingKey

Re: [BRLTTY] Baum routing keys

2008-01-12 Thread Samuel Thibault
Dave Mielke, le Sun 13 Jan 2008 00:45:08 -0500, a écrit : > [quoted lines by Samuel Thibault on 2008/01/13 at 05:26 +] > > >I'm giving a try at routing keys, but there's a line in the driver that > >I don't understand: > > > >resetKeyGroup(packet.data.values.routingKeys, cellCount, > >packet.

Re: [BRLTTY] Baum routing keys

2008-01-12 Thread Dave Mielke
[quoted lines by Samuel Thibault on 2008/01/13 at 05:52 +] >Ah ok, so packet here is merely used as a buffer? It's the real input packet. It's just being modified to look like a different kind of packet. The type isn't modified (perhaps it ought to be) because it's been already inspected an