Hi listers,
could i install opensolaris with brltty?
Are there any parameters for booting the dvd?
Thanks for ur help.
best Regards Marco
-
Windows ist wie ein Lemming...
... es läuft planlos in der Gegend rum, um dann gezielt abzustürzen.
___
On Mon, Jan 07, 2008 at 09:47:11AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> could i install opensolaris with brltty?
Not as far as I am aware, except possibly remotely over a network. From what I
have read on mailing lists, OpenSolaris have their Gnome accessibility in
order but I haven't read anything a
Hi Jason,
tnx for ur help about opensolaris!
u told something about modiffied fedora immage: How could i find this and
in which version is that immage?
Tnx once more.
regards Marco
-
Windows ist wie ein Lemming...
... es läuft planlos in der Gegend rum, um dann gezielt abz
Hi all,
I'm reviewing TTS systems; i need one that works in both GNU/Linux and
Windows.
I haven't been able to find any information about this issue in the brltty
website, so i ask here... what's the state of brltty support for Windows
(2000 and XP)?
Thanks in advance,
--
Bruno González
If you mean by TTS systems the actual TTS engine, brltty isn't that. As
far as things go with actual TTS engines, I would say espeak
(http://espeak.sf.net) is probably the best cross platform synth for
accessibility needs, but festival may be more to your taste. If you go
commercial, there is the i
Hi Bruno,
Brltty does not support speech in Windows. There may be plans for it but as
far as I know nothing has been debugged. Note that I'm braille only so I
wouldn't be the first to know even if it were debugged.
Note that you have to distinguish between the synthesizer, the part that
actual
Bruno Gonzalez, le Mon 07 Jan 2008 16:41:50 +0100, a écrit :
> I haven't been able to find any information about this issue in the brltty
> website, so i ask here... what's the state of brltty support for Windows
> (2000 and XP)?
Concerning speech, there is no particular support, just the unix
On Mon, 2008-01-07 at 11:31 -0500, Lee Maschmeyer wrote:
> Hi Bruno,
>
> Brltty does not support speech in Windows. There may be plans for it but as
> far as I know nothing has been debugged. Note that I'm braille only so I
> wouldn't be the first to know even if it were debugged.
>
> Note that
On Mon, 07 Jan 2008 17:22:10 +0100, Michael Whapples <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> If you mean by TTS systems the actual TTS engine, brltty isn't that. As
> far as things go with actual TTS engines, I would say espeak
Ok, thanks for clearing that up. I'm no expert in TTS or screen readers
termi
Bruno Gonzalez, le Mon 07 Jan 2008 17:54:31 +0100, a écrit :
> From what i read, it looks like BRLTTY is a screen reader... but does it
> include a syntethizer that i may be able to use directly?
It doesn't include any synthetizer.
Samuel
___
This me
>My intention is to feed the library with plain text.
Sounds like you're going to write another screen reader. Is this really
necessary? You'd mostly be reinventing the wheel. It might be less fun but
more useful to join one of the existing projects. Lots of people going off
in all directions
On Mon, 07 Jan 2008 18:06:09 +0100, Samuel Thibault
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Bruno Gonzalez, le Mon 07 Jan 2008 17:54:31 +0100, a écrit :
>> From what i read, it looks like BRLTTY is a screen reader... but does
>> it
>> include a syntethizer that i may be able to use directly?
>
> It does
On Mon, 2008-01-07 at 17:54 +0100, Bruno Gonzalez wrote:
> On Mon, 07 Jan 2008 17:22:10 +0100, Michael Whapples <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > If you mean by TTS systems the actual TTS engine, brltty isn't that. As
> > far as things go with actual TTS engines, I would say espeak
>
> Ok, thanks
On Mon, 07 Jan 2008 18:32:30 +0100, Michael Whapples <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Mon, 2008-01-07 at 17:54 +0100, Bruno Gonzalez wrote:
> I would say espeak or festival (personally I would say espeak, but
> others may disagree). I don't think there is any way to send text to the
> speech
On Mon, 07 Jan 2008 18:23:47 +0100, Lee Maschmeyer
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sounds like you're going to write another screen reader. Is this really
> necessary? You'd mostly be reinventing the wheel. It might be less fun
> but
> more useful to join one of the existing projects. Lots of pe
On Mon, 2008-01-07 at 12:23 -0500, Lee Maschmeyer wrote:
> >My intention is to feed the library with plain text.
>
> Sounds like you're going to write another screen reader. Is this really
> necessary? You'd mostly be reinventing the wheel. It might be less fun but
> more useful to join one of
16 matches
Mail list logo
