On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 01:18:52PM -0400, Dave Mielke wrote:
> [quoted lines by Nicolas Pitre on 2014/10/31 at 13:04 -0400]
>
> >I think it is probably time to give up on the idea of a statically
> >linked binary. So many things are split into separate files for good
> >reasons: drivers, config
[quoted lines by Nicolas Pitre on 2014/10/31 at 13:04 -0400]
>I think it is probably time to give up on the idea of a statically
>linked binary. So many things are split into separate files for good
>reasons: drivers, config files, braille tables, key bindings, help
>screens, etc. So the idea
On Fri, 31 Oct 2014, Dave Mielke wrote:
> [quoted lines by S. Massy on 2014/10/31 at 11:29 -0400]
>
> >It might still be appropriate to flash a warning message on the display
> >and/or in the logs when no bindings are available.
>
> That's a good idea - thanks.
>
> What are your thoughts regard
[quoted lines by S. Massy on 2014/10/31 at 11:29 -0400]
>It might still be appropriate to flash a warning message on the display
>and/or in the logs when no bindings are available.
That's a good idea - thanks.
What are your thoughts regarding adding a bunch of code to support built-in key
table
On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 11:41:48PM -0400, Dave Mielke wrote:
> [quoted lines by S. Massy on 2014/10/30 at 14:37 -0400]
>
> >A further observation on compiling and using a statically linked binary
> >of BRLTTY is that keybindings default tables no longer seem to be built
> >into the driver(s).
>
[quoted lines by S. Massy on 2014/10/30 at 14:37 -0400]
>A further observation on compiling and using a statically linked binary
>of BRLTTY is that keybindings default tables no longer seem to be built
>into the driver(s).
The key tables never were built in. The bindings were only ever (for some
Hello,
A further observation on compiling and using a statically linked binary
of BRLTTY is that keybindings default tables no longer seem to be built
into the driver(s). Hence, one can't just copy the binary and run
./brltty. I've found it most expedient to copy the whole data directory
and specif
[quoted lines by S. Massy on 2014/10/24 at 08:58 -0400]
>So here are the configure options I used to build a statically linked
>binary of BRLTTY:
>./configure --enable-standalone-programs --disable-speech-support \
> --disable-x --disable-api --with-screen-driver=lx \
> --with-
[quoted lines by S. Massy on 2014/10/24 at 10:08 -0400]
>> On Cygwin I used:
>>
>> ./autogen && ./configure -q --enable-standalone-programs
>> --disable-java-bindings && make -s
>I think you will need to exclude a lot of features,
What may need disabling will be different from one platform to a
On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 09:37:51AM -0400, Lee Maschmeyer wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Cygwin I used:
>
> ./autogen && ./configure -q --enable-standalone-programs
> --disable-java-bindings && make -s
I think you will need to exclude a lot of features, also note that you
must build your screen and braill
Hello,
On Cygwin I used:
./autogen &&
./configure -q --enable-standalone-programs --disable-java-bindings &&
make -s
Attached is the script that resulted from this command. I get a 0 return
code when the --enable-standalone-programs is not in the command but when it
is the error(s) are sho
Hello,
So here are the configure options I used to build a statically linked
binary of BRLTTY:
./configure --enable-standalone-programs --disable-speech-support \
--disable-x --disable-api --with-screen-driver=lx \
--with-braille-driver=hw --with-text-table=en-nabcc \
[quoted lines by S. Massy on 2014/10/23 at 23:04 -0400]
>It does indeed work, though I had to explicitly disable a bunch of
>features and packages.
Please let us know which ones.
--
Dave Mielke | 2213 Fox Crescent | The Bible is the very Word of God.
Phone: 1-613-726-0014 | Ottawa, O
On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 09:53:50PM -0400, Dave Mielke wrote:
> [quoted lines by S. Massy on 2014/10/23 at 21:42 -0400]
>
> >This is off the 5.1 release tarball. Should I use the development tree?
>
> Yes, please. If there's still a problem, I'd like to see it resolved before
> 5.2
> is formally
[quoted lines by S. Massy on 2014/10/23 at 21:42 -0400]
>This is off the 5.1 release tarball. Should I use the development tree?
Yes, please. If there's still a problem, I'd like to see it resolved before 5.2
is formally released.
--
Dave Mielke | 2213 Fox Crescent | The Bible is the
On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 09:12:44PM -0400, Dave Mielke wrote:
> Is there any particular reason that you're trying to build such old brltty
> source?
This is off the 5.1 release tarball. Should I use the development tree?
Cheers,
S.M.
>
> --
> Dave Mielke | 2213 Fox Crescent | The Bible
[quoted lines by S. Massy on 2014/10/23 at 20:53 -0400]
>> >Is this still supported/tested? When I enable the
>> >--enable-standalone-programs option, compilation aborts with complaints
>> >that memcpy is being redefined.
This is an example of why I keep nagging people to post the log so that we
On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 11:26:22AM -0400, Dave Mielke wrote:
> [quoted lines by S. Massy on 2014/10/22 at 16:43 -0400]
>
> >Is this still supported/tested? When I enable the
> >--enable-standalone-programs option, compilation aborts with complaints
> >that memcpy is being redefined.
>
> Please p
[quoted lines by S. Massy on 2014/10/22 at 16:43 -0400]
>Is this still supported/tested? When I enable the
>--enable-standalone-programs option, compilation aborts with complaints
>that memcpy is being redefined.
Please post a log of the build so that we can see the actual messages.
--
Dave Mi
19 matches
Mail list logo
