I wrote:
>
>> IIRC, there was a story somewhere that the s...@home software
>> included a bug (like a crippleware) that would make it run
>> _much slower_ than it could run, because there was not enough
>> data for the millions of computers that would process this
>> data.
>>
>> I am confusing t
On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 2:59 PM, Alberto Monteiro
wrote:
> IIRC, there was a story somewhere that the s...@home software
> included a bug (like a crippleware) that would make it run
> _much slower_ than it could run, because there was not enough
> data for the millions of computers that would proc
Alberto Monteiro wrote:
IIRC, there was a story somewhere that the s...@home software
included a bug (like a crippleware) that would make it run
_much slower_ than it could run, because there was not enough
data for the millions of computers that would process this
data.
I am confusing things?
IIRC, there was a story somewhere that the s...@home software
included a bug (like a crippleware) that would make it run
_much slower_ than it could run, because there was not enough
data for the millions of computers that would process this
data.
I am confusing things? I couldn't find any refere
