Re: [Boost-cmake] Release 1.41.0.cmake0

2009-11-18 Thread James C. Sutherland
On Nov 18, 2009, at 9:56 AM, troy d. straszheim wrote: > > Here's the first release for 1.41.0, take it out for a spin: > > http://sodium.resophonic.com/boost-cmake/1.41.0.cmake0 > > Get back to me here with your comments or questions. > > -t > Why is boost::mpi "disabled" on apple? The bj

Re: [Boost-cmake] Release 1.41.0.cmake0

2009-11-18 Thread James C. Sutherland
On Nov 18, 2009, at 12:25 PM, troy d. straszheim wrote: > James C. Sutherland wrote: >> On Nov 18, 2009, at 9:56 AM, troy d. straszheim wrote: >>> Here's the first release for 1.41.0, take it out for a spin: >>> >>> http://sodium.resophonic.com/boost-cm

Re: [Boost-cmake] Release 1.41.0.cmake0

2009-11-18 Thread James C. Sutherland
On Nov 18, 2009, at 12:53 PM, troy d. straszheim wrote: > James C. Sutherland wrote: >> On Nov 18, 2009, at 12:25 PM, troy d. straszheim wrote: >>> James C. Sutherland wrote: >>>> On Nov 18, 2009, at 9:56 AM, troy d. straszheim wrote: >>>>> Here'

[Boost-cmake] Linking Debug Builds

2009-11-24 Thread James C. Sutherland
I initially installed only the "release" version of the boost libs. When I built a debug version of my application, the linker failed because apparently it triggered a search for the debug version of the boost libraries, which were not installed. Shouldn't there be a fall-back position to link

Re: [Boost-cmake] Linking Debug Builds

2009-11-24 Thread James C. Sutherland
luequartz.net > Principal Software Engineer Dayton, Ohio > > On Nov 24, 2009, at 10:15 AM, James C. Sutherland wrote: > >> I initially installed only the "release" version of the boost libs. When I >> built a debug version of my application, the link

Re: [Boost-cmake] Linking Debug Builds

2009-11-24 Thread James C. Sutherland
24, 2009, at 9:51 AM, Michael Jackson wrote: > Is your project using CMake? I think in the FindBoost.cmake there is a fall > back to use the Release libraries. But it has been a while since I > investigated that. > > Mike > > On Nov 24, 2009, at 11:45 AM, James C. Sutherland

Re: [Boost-cmake] boost 1.41.0-cmake0 and CMake 2.6.4 - The usual, CMake can not find boost.

2009-12-04 Thread James C. Sutherland
Mike, I use: find_package( Boost REQUIRED COMPONENTS ${boost_comps} NO_MODULE ) (note the "NO_MODULE") for the CMake-built boost. This uses the BoostConfig.cmake file installed by the CMake boost. It seems to work very well. This allows you to bypass the "FindBoost.cmake" entirely. J

Re: [Boost-cmake] Cmake Variable Naming

2009-12-07 Thread James C. Sutherland
On Dec 7, 2009, at 10:34 AM, Michael Jackson wrote: > Just a comment on some of the variable naming within the Cmake files. There > are already some folks embedding the entire boost-cmake distribution into > their own projects, then using "add_subdirectory()" to try and build just > the parts that

Re: [Boost-cmake] Using BCP to create a "Subset" of Boost ... And CMake ... And Windows

2009-12-10 Thread James C. Sutherland
On Dec 10, 2009, at 12:02 PM, Michael Jackson wrote: > So I hacked on bcp a bit to add in the detection of CMake files so when doing > something like: > > [mjackson] $ bcp boost/program_options.hpp boost/smart_ptr.hpp > boost/pointer_cast.hpp boost/algorithm/string.hpp boost/thread.hpp > too