troy d. straszheim wrote:
> So the only files that conflict are BoostConfig.cmake and
> BoostConfigVersion.cmake in /usr/share/boost/cmake; but they don't
> really conflict, because they are version agnostic.
[snip]
> Do I pass a sanity-check? It has become hard to tell.
It is an interesting app
2009/11/1 troy d. straszheim
> I have a version cmake5 in the works, you're welcome to try the head of my
> 1.40.branch, where all of these should be fixed. (I'd appreciate the
> testing). This 1.40.0.cmake5 release contains a lot of stuff backported from
> the 1.41 branch.
>
Thanks Troy.
On a
Hello,
as Troy mentioned (http://lists.boost.org/boost-cmake/2009/10/0740.php), the
head of the 1.40.0 git branch allows generating the RPM packages for Fedora
11 on both 32 and 64bit platforms.
Just for information, I have updated the change request on Bugzilla:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_
Denis Arnaud wrote:
Hello,
as Troy mentioned (http://lists.boost.org/boost-cmake/2009/10/0740.php),
the head of the 1.40.0 git branch allows generating the RPM packages for
Fedora 11 on both 32 and 64bit platforms.
Just for information, I have updated the change request on Bugzilla:
https:/
