On Dec 3, 2008, at 9:09 AM, troy d. straszheim wrote:
Hey Joaquin,
JOAQUIN M. LOPEZ MUÑOZ wrote:
Hi,
I've discovered that the libs at the trunk are populated by files
by the name CMakeLists.txt and module.cmake and I assume
these belong to the once annonced effort to create a build
infrastruc
Hey Joaquin,
JOAQUIN M. LOPEZ MUÑOZ wrote:
Hi,
I've discovered that the libs at the trunk are populated by files
by the name CMakeLists.txt and module.cmake and I assume
these belong to the once annonced effort to create a build
infrastructure for Boost with CMake. I'd have several questions
in
on Tue Oct 21 2008, David Abrahams wrote:
> on Tue Oct 21 2008, "Sergey Nikulov" wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> Could you please inform if anybody from boost community still working
>> on integrating boost with CMake?
>
> Yes, I am.
>
>> What is current status/plans for this integration?
>
> I thin
on Tue Oct 21 2008, "Sergey Nikulov" wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Could you please inform if anybody from boost community still working
> on integrating boost with CMake?
Yes, I am.
> What is current status/plans for this integration?
I think you can learn a lot here:
http://svn.boost.org/trac/boost
Also, do you need a tester for OS X? I am running 10.4.11 Intel and
would be
happy to try and setup some sort of script to download and test
regularly.
I'll have to leave the testing question to Troy, who is our testing
guru. If you'd like to test out a binary installer for 10.4 (Tiger),
I'
Mike Jackson wrote:
Also, do you need a tester for OS X? I am running 10.4.11 Intel and
would be happy to try and setup some sort of script to download and test
regularly.
Hey Mike,
I'll take you up on that, I'd definitely like some testers. I'm many
time zones from home right now but w
On Aug 6, 2008, at 3:43 PM, Doug Gregor wrote:
On Wed, Aug 6, 2008 at 3:40 PM, Mike Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
On Aug 6, 2008, at 3:29 PM, troy d. straszheim wrote:
Anyhow, you might be more interested in the new installer stuff
Doug has been putting together:
http://www.osl.iu.ed
On Wed, Aug 6, 2008 at 3:40 PM, Mike Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Aug 6, 2008, at 3:29 PM, troy d. straszheim wrote:
>
>> Anyhow, you might be more interested in the new installer stuff
>> Doug has been putting together:
>>
>> http://www.osl.iu.edu/~dgregor/Boost-CMake/
>>
>> A test run
On Aug 6, 2008, at 3:29 PM, troy d. straszheim wrote:
Anyhow, you might be more interested in the new installer stuff
Doug has been putting together:
http://www.osl.iu.edu/~dgregor/Boost-CMake/
A test run and report back would be appreciated, I'm sure. Hope to
hear back from you,
I to
On Wed, Aug 6, 2008 at 3:29 PM, troy d. straszheim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Matthias Schabel wrote:
>>
>> After experiencing non-stop frustration with building boost 1.36 on OS X
>> with bjam/boost.build, I was excited to discover that there has been
>> significant work on porting to CMake. A c
Matthias Schabel wrote:
After experiencing non-stop frustration with building boost 1.36 on OS X
with bjam/boost.build, I was excited to discover that there has been
significant work on porting to CMake. A couple of questions:
1) where are the most current CMake build files located?
$SVN/bra
11 matches
Mail list logo
