on Sun Jul 13 2008, "Doug Gregor" wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 13, 2008 at 3:29 PM, David Abrahams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> on Sun Jul 13 2008, "Doug Gregor" wrote:
>>
>>> I went ahead and hacked this up; it's in the tree now. Looks like we
>>> have a bit of work to do to get all of the depende
On Sun, Jul 13, 2008 at 3:29 PM, David Abrahams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> on Sun Jul 13 2008, "Doug Gregor" wrote:
>
>> I went ahead and hacked this up; it's in the tree now. Looks like we
>> have a bit of work to do to get all of the dependencies right. When I
>> saw some failures due to the
on Sun Jul 13 2008, "Doug Gregor" wrote:
> I went ahead and hacked this up; it's in the tree now. Looks like we
> have a bit of work to do to get all of the dependencies right. When I
> saw some failures due to the inability to find boost/config.hpp, I
> started wondering... should we define in
On Fri, Jul 4, 2008 at 8:02 PM, Doug Gregor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Miguel,
>
> On Thu, Jul 3, 2008 at 4:16 PM, Miguel A. Figueroa-Villanueva
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I have attached a patch for your consideration. It basically removes
>> the dependency on modularize.py by using cmak
On Fri, Jul 4, 2008 at 7:02 PM, Doug Gregor wrote:
> Hi Miguel,
>
> On Thu, Jul 3, 2008 at 4:16 PM, Miguel A. Figueroa-Villanueva wrote:
>> I have attached a patch for your consideration. It basically removes
>> the dependency on modularize.py by using cmake commands. This should
>> work on any pla
Hi Miguel,
On Thu, Jul 3, 2008 at 4:16 PM, Miguel A. Figueroa-Villanueva
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have attached a patch for your consideration. It basically removes
> the dependency on modularize.py by using cmake commands. This should
> work on any platform.
Great! This worked well for me,
