Re: [Boost-cmake] CMake for development testing

On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 7:30 AM, Bill Hoffman wrote: > Brad King wrote: >> >> David Abrahams wrote: >>> >>>  67/ 79 Testing Python-result                    Passed >>>  68/ 79 Testing Python-string_literal         ***Failed >>>  69/ 79 Testing Python-borrowed               ***Failed >>>  70/ 79 Test

Re: [Boost-cmake] CMake for development testing

Brad King wrote: David Abrahams wrote: 67/ 79 Testing Python-resultPassed 68/ 79 Testing Python-string_literal ***Failed 69/ 79 Testing Python-borrowed ***Failed 70/ 79 Testing Python-object_managerPassed 71/ 79 Testing Python-copy_ctor_

Re: [Boost-cmake] CMake for development testing

Excerpts from David Abrahams's message of Fri Jun 05 23:09:44 +0200 2009: > However, the way CMake reports failures really doesn't fit in with my > development workflow. I'm doing > > make Python-test > > and what I get back looks something like this: > > ... > > 67/ 79 Testing Pyt

Re: [Boost-cmake] CMake for development testing

David Abrahams wrote: 67/ 79 Testing Python-resultPassed 68/ 79 Testing Python-string_literal ***Failed 69/ 79 Testing Python-borrowed ***Failed 70/ 79 Testing Python-object_managerPassed 71/ 79 Testing Python-copy_ctor_mutates_rhs Pa