On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 12:37 PM, Mike Jackson
wrote:
>
> I particularly like CMake. I think it is simple to learn and does
> what it is supposed to do without trying to give you the kitchen sick
> in the process.
>
>
> Having said that I have not tried to use Boost.build for anything else
> bes
I particularly like CMake. I think it is simple to learn and does
what it is supposed to do without trying to give you the kitchen sick
in the process.
Having said that I have not tried to use Boost.build for anything else
besides building the Boost libraries and even then I find it hard to
fi
I'm trying to focus my efforts on learning a single build system for
*nix c++ while keeping things as high level as possible (I'm used to
MSVC++ where I don't need to worry about this stuff). Both
Boost.build and CMake seem to me to fill the same niche but perhaps
I'm missing something. Guidance
