Re: [Boost-cmake] Boost-CMake with recent changes from upstream

On 8/17/10 2:32 PM, in article aanlktinxf25=fohags_chbxgvq=5x8jngp6z4429d...@mail.gmail.com, "Denis Arnaud" wrote: > 2010/8/17 Michael Jackson > > >> So I saw the announcement that Boost 1.44.0 had been released. I took a >> look >> around www.gitorious.com/boost and noticed that the following:

Re: [Boost-cmake] Boost-CMake with recent changes from upstream

2010/8/17 Michael Jackson > So I saw the announcement that Boost 1.44.0 had been released. I took a > look > around www.gitorious.com/boost and noticed that the following: > http://gitorious.org/~denisarnaud/boost/denisarnauds-zeuners-boost-cmake/co > mmits/1.44.0-denis

Re: [Boost-cmake] Boost-CMake with recent changes from upstream

So I saw the announcement that Boost 1.44.0 had been released. I took a look around www.gitorious.com/boost and noticed that the following: http://gitorious.org/~denisarnaud/boost/denisarnauds-zeuners-boost-cmake/co mmits/1.44.0-denis Is a clone that is keeping up with the latest releases and HE

Re: [Boost-cmake] Boost-CMake with recent changes from upstream

On 4/28/10 10:48 AM, in article 201004281048.07303.marcus.hanw...@kitware.com, "Marcus D. Hanwell" wrote: > On Wednesday 28 April 2010 06:07:56 Isidor Zeuner wrote: >>> Seconded. If I find fixes, I will try to send patches. >> >> Great! Patches and other feedback are always welcome. >> > I am al

Re: [Boost-cmake] Boost-CMake with recent changes from upstream

On Wednesday 28 April 2010 06:07:56 Isidor Zeuner wrote: > > Seconded. If I find fixes, I will try to send patches. > > Great! Patches and other feedback are always welcome. > I am also using the Boost CMake build system in a project, and have thus far been using 1.41.0, but welcome the chance t

Re: [Boost-cmake] Boost-CMake with recent changes from upstream

Sounds like you did everyone a favor. Thanks. Why isn't the CMake state being kept up to date in the first place? Is it because there's an effort to make a whole competing Boost build system? What's the rationale for that? Seems a bit wasteful to come up with a whole new system, when the time c

Re: [Boost-cmake] Boost-CMake with recent changes from upstream

> > Seconded. If I find fixes, I will try to send patches. > Great! Patches and other feedback are always welcome. Best regards, Isidor ___ Boost-cmake mailing list Boost-cmake@lists.boost.org http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-cmake

Re: [Boost-cmake] Boost-CMake with recent changes from upstream

> Thanks a lot, that's an excellent initiative! I do hope that it will re- > activate Boost-CMaker enthusiasm :) Seconded. If I find fixes, I will try to send patches. JB -- John Biddiscombe,    email:biddisco @ cscs.ch http://www.cscs.ch/ CSCS, Swiss National Supercomput

Re: [Boost-cmake] Boost-CMake with recent changes from upstream

Thanks a lot, that's an excellent initiative! I do hope that it will re-activate Boost-CMaker enthusiasm :) Best Regards Denis 2010/4/24 Isidor Zeuner > [...] I decided to give it a try and iteratively applied all the upstream > patches since the point where Boost-CMake was current on the Boos

[Boost-cmake] Boost-CMake with recent changes from upstream

Hello fellow Boosters and CMakers, as I got tired of deciding between using recent Boost code and enjoying CMake's convenience, I decided to give it a try and iteratively applied all the upstream patches since the point where Boost-CMake was current on the Boost-CMake source. The result can be acq