e a lot of other differences between a make-installed version
of Boost w/CMake and a make-installed version Boost w/bjam?
--
Philip Lowman
___
Boost-cmake mailing list
Boost-cmake@lists.boost.org
http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-cmake
e ideas but nothing too firm yet.
Not that I don't appreciate all of the hard work being done getting
Boost to build with CMake, but is making a "clean break with the past"
really a good idea here? That is to say, wouldn't it be easier on
everyone if the CMake build of Boost matched the bjam defaults
(especially when it comes to filename/path issues)?
--
Philip Lowman
___
Boost-cmake mailing list
Boost-cmake@lists.boost.org
http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-cmake
On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 11:24 PM, Belcourt, Kenneth wrote:
> Hi Philip,
> On Oct 7, 2009, at 7:55 PM, Philip Lowman wrote:
>
> On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 11:12 AM, Justin Holewinski
> wrote:
>
>>
>> I am trying to compile Boost 1.40 with the Intel C++ Compiler, Version
ers. Any reason why this is happening?
You could look into the Boost preprocessor definitions that disable auto
linking and rely instead on CMake's target_link_libraries(). See the
FindBoost docs for more information.
--
Philip Lowman
___
Boost-cmake mailing list
Boost-cmake@lists.boost.org
http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-cmake
problem
until a fix can be released (or if this doesn't help at all) you can likely
use BOOST_ROOT or BOOST_LIBRARYDIR as a CMake variable or environment
variable.
Also, for whatever reason, FindBoost does not use the include path detected
for the headers as a hint for find
already grouped by a label that relates back to
the boost library they derive from so implementing this would only be a
matter of a different viewer. I've filed a feature request for it here.
Feel free to add comments if you'd like.
http://public.kitware.com/Bug/view.php?id=8991
It has a graphical front end if
> that is your cup of tea or can be effectively run from the command
> line. All CMake needs to run is a C++ compiler.
Agreed with everything Mike said except that CMake doesn't need a C++
compiler, it also works f
