On 4/28/10 10:48 AM, in article
201004281048.07303.marcus.hanw...@kitware.com, "Marcus D. Hanwell" wrote:
> On Wednesday 28 April 2010 06:07:56 Isidor Zeuner wrote:
>>> Seconded. If I find fixes, I will try to send patches.
>>
>> Great! Patches and other feedback are always welcome.
>>
> I am al
On Wednesday 28 April 2010 06:07:56 Isidor Zeuner wrote:
> > Seconded. If I find fixes, I will try to send patches.
>
> Great! Patches and other feedback are always welcome.
>
I am also using the Boost CMake build system in a project, and have thus far
been using 1.41.0, but welcome the chance t
Sounds like you did everyone a favor. Thanks.
Why isn't the CMake state being kept up to date in the first place?
Is it because there's an effort to make a whole competing Boost build
system? What's the rationale for that?
Seems a bit wasteful to come up with a whole new system, when the time
c