Re: [Boost-cmake] Boost-CMake with recent changes from upstream

2010-05-03 Thread Michael Jackson
On 4/28/10 10:48 AM, in article 201004281048.07303.marcus.hanw...@kitware.com, "Marcus D. Hanwell" wrote: > On Wednesday 28 April 2010 06:07:56 Isidor Zeuner wrote: >>> Seconded. If I find fixes, I will try to send patches. >> >> Great! Patches and other feedback are always welcome. >> > I am al

Re: [Boost-cmake] Boost-CMake with recent changes from upstream

2010-05-03 Thread Marcus D. Hanwell
On Wednesday 28 April 2010 06:07:56 Isidor Zeuner wrote: > > Seconded. If I find fixes, I will try to send patches. > > Great! Patches and other feedback are always welcome. > I am also using the Boost CMake build system in a project, and have thus far been using 1.41.0, but welcome the chance t

Re: [Boost-cmake] Boost-CMake with recent changes from upstream

2010-05-03 Thread G S
Sounds like you did everyone a favor. Thanks. Why isn't the CMake state being kept up to date in the first place? Is it because there's an effort to make a whole competing Boost build system? What's the rationale for that? Seems a bit wasteful to come up with a whole new system, when the time c