Re: [Boost-cmake] First time build of boost-1.40.0 with cmake

2009-09-17 Thread troy d. straszheim
John Murdie wrote: I'd link all .hpp files I could find to /usr/local/include64/boost/*/ (as appropriate) and add: -DRELEASE_COMPILE_FLAGS="-O3 -DNDEBUG -I/usr/local/include64" to the cmake arguments, but there must be an easier way of preventing this problem, surely? I'm pretty sure the pa

Re: [Boost-cmake] [PATCH] building Boost.Python fails

2009-09-17 Thread troy d. straszheim
Bill Hoffman wrote: So, at boost con we talked about setting up CDash for Boost. I think it would be much easier to maintain the CMake files for Boost if such a testing system were in place. I definitely agree. -t ___ Boost-cmake mailing list

[Boost-cmake] First time build of boost-1.40.0 with cmake

2009-09-17 Thread John Murdie
I'm trying for the first time to build boost 1.40.0 from source with cmake. This on a Slackware Linux system which requires an 64-bit installation of boost in addition to an earlier-made 32-bit one (version 1.35.0). I've been unable to find any tutorial information, and so have had to deduce what t

Re: [Boost-cmake] [PATCH] building Boost.Python fails

2009-09-17 Thread Bill Hoffman
troy d. straszheim wrote: Well, there was some discussion about this over on the -dev list. I would like to have cmake removed completely from boost svn to avoid confusion. Vladimir Prus has pointed out that the locations of the cmakefiles violate some code-organization standards. Due to