Re: [Boost-cmake] CMake modularization update

2008-11-07 Thread Doug Gregor
On Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 11:55 AM, Michael Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Any ideas on what we would like to keep "un-modularized" for now? Looking > at the dependency > graph here are my own thoughts on which libraries should probably be kept > un-modularized for now: > >mpl >

Re: [Boost-cmake] CMake modularization update

2008-11-07 Thread Michael Jackson
On Oct 31, 2008, at 2:16 PM, Doug Gregor wrote: What I am not sure of is what to do with the remaining headers in the "boost" directory. Are those going to be the "core" of Boost or ? Yeah, that's how I would do it. So are talking about modularizing what is left into "libs/core" then?

Re: [Boost-cmake] Progress Report

2008-11-07 Thread Michael Jackson
On Nov 5, 2008, at 7:56 PM, Michael Jackson wrote: On Nov 4, 2008, at 2:21 PM, Michael Jackson wrote: On Nov 4, 2008, at 2:11 PM, Beman Dawes wrote: On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 12:26 PM, Michael Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I have been working hard on updating the CMake build system to