of the Membership Committee. Based on
the last elections, [2] this is Simon Phipps.
I therefore ask you, Simon Phipps, if you accept your new role and want to
serve in The Document Foundation's Membership Committee as full member.
Florian
[1]
http://www.documentfoundation.
Thanks for your proposal Charles. I've been considering it today and would
like to accept your nomination.
My full name is Simon Phipps and I'm in my 50s, live in Southampton in the
UK with my wife, have a grown family and work as an open source consultant.
My current employer (Wipro
ommunication and
collaboration, and this is sorely needed because of the dominance of
proprietary solutions in the lives and minds of the world's computer users.
--
*Simon Phipps* http://webmink.com
*Office:* +1 (415) 683-7660 *or* +44 (238) 098 7027
*Mobile*: +44 774 776 2816 *or Telegram <https://telegram.me/webmink>*
v 25, 2015 at 9:07 PM, Simon Phipps wrote:
> Thanks for your proposal Charles. I've been considering it today and would
> like to accept your nomination.
>
>
> My full name is Simon Phipps and I'm in my 50s, live in Southampton in the
> UK with my wife, have a grown f
I, Simon Phipps, elected Director of the Board of The Document
> Foundation, hereby accept this position within the Stiftung bürgerlichen
> Rechts "The Document Foundation". My term will start February 18, 2016.
>
Signed: Simon Phipps
>
Ich, Simon Phipps, gewähltes Vor
In order to comply with the bylaws of TDF:
I, Simon Phipps, elected member of the board of The Document Foundation,
hereby and until further notice nominate the following elected deputies to
represent me during board meetings of all kinds, in the order set forth
below:
1. Deputy Norbert
e.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
> Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
> List archive:
> http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/board-discuss/
> All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be
> deleted
On Wed, Feb 1, 2017 at 2:32 PM, K-J LibreOffice wrote:
> Am 12.01.2017 um 12:24 schrieb Katarina Behrens:
>
>> Hello world & BoD,
>>
>> it has been brought to my attention that one of our (female)
>> contributors, who
>> is also a TDF member (this is why membership committee is in Cc:) has been
>
Hi Michael,
On Wed, Feb 1, 2017 at 2:41 PM, Michael Meeks
wrote:
>
>
> On 01/02/17 14:38, Simon Phipps wrote:
> > The Code should indicate that a Trustee can forfeit membership
> > for a serious breach.
>
> Interestingly, he was not a member anymore, and
On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 5:22 PM, Andreas Mantke wrote:
> Hi Cor, all,
>
> Am 31.10.2017 um 17:12 schrieb Cor Nouws:
> > Hi Andreas,
> >
> > Andreas Mantke wrote on 31-10-17 13:44:
> >
> >> that's not the topic, I wrote about. I wrote about very close personal
> >> or economic connections, not the
On 31 Oct 2017 18:54, "Andreas Mantke" wrote:
Hi Simon, Cor, all,
Am 31.10.2017 um 19:19 schrieb Simon Phipps:
>
>
> On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 5:22 PM, Andreas Mantke <mailto:ma...@gmx.de>> wrote:
>
> Hi Cor, all,
>
> Am 31.10.2017 um 17:
rector and have extensive
business experience which I have used to TDF's advantage. Now independent,
I'd be honoured to serve again; my priority will be the new challenges of
the cloud era."
Personal information:
My full name is Simon Phipps
I am nominated in a personal capacity and have no c
>
>
> I, Simon Phipps, elected Deputy Director of the Board of The Document
> Foundation, hereby accept this position within the Stiftung bürgerlichen
> Rechts "The Document Foundation". My term will start February 18, 2018.
>
> Signed: Simon Phipps
>
>
Since this primarily affects the software would it not be a topic for the
ESC?
{Terse? Mobile!}
On Mon, 19 Nov 2018, 11:32 Heiko Tietze I'd like to ask again for a decision regarding the MIME icon. Question was
> if we can find a more appearing icon for LibreOffice or create something
> more spe
I agree but I was considering just the decision-making aspect rather than
the implementation.
{Terse? Mobile!}
On Mon, 19 Nov 2018, 12:04 Franklin Weng Besides ESC I would suggest to get some more professional visual designers
> into this topic.
>
> Simon Phipps 於 2018年11月19日 週一
The BOD would likely need to approve whatever the ESC proposes, sure.
On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 11:46 AM K-J LibreOffice
wrote:
> Am 19.11.2018 um 11:35 schrieb Simon Phipps:
> > Since this primarily affects the software would it not be a topic for
> > the ESC?
>
> As the
Hi!
On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 11:12 AM Thorsten Behrens <
t...@documentfoundation.org> wrote:
> Michael Meeks wrote:
> > On 28/11/2018 09:40, Michael Stahl wrote:
> > > so i'll propose to migrate the ODF Toolkit to The Document Foundation.
> >
> > Seems like something the BoD should vote on,
As they say at Apache, +1
S.
On Fri, 30 Nov 2018, 17:05 Thorsten Behrens Dear board,
>
> as the discussion seems to have calmed down, and also folks over at
> Apache seem to be supportive - let me call a vote:
>
> * TDF to formally offer the ASF to take over the ODF Toolkit project
> * by copyin
oftware does not have any offices so this arrangement is ideal.
Happy to answer further questions on this,
Simon
--
*Simon Phipps*, * Deputy Board Director, *The Document Foundation
*Desk:* +44 238 098 7027 *Mobile/Signal:* +44 774 776 2816
*Official address*: Kurfürstendamm 188, 10707 B
Hi!
On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 5:33 PM Thomas Meyer wrote:
> subsumtion:
> * it's really the situation of self dealing (you are sitting on both sides
> of the same table).
>
No, as I am only a Board deputy rather than a full director, have not voted
on this proposal and will not do so at the Board
fähige Stiftung des bürgerlichen Rechts
> Legal details: http://www.documentfoundation.org/imprint
>
> --
> To unsubscribe e-mail to: board-discuss+unsubscr...@documentfoundation.org
> Problems?
> https://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
> Posting guideli
I favour having one or two seats reserved for appointment by the board
rather than by election, so that missing skills or representations can be
temporarily addressed. OSI just did this, for example.
S
On Mon, 2 Dec 2019, 23:22 Sam Tuke, wrote:
> Thanks Thorsten; that's very helpful context. Th
> Problems?
> https://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
> Posting guidelines + more: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
> List archive:
> https://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/board-discuss/
> Privacy Policy: https://www.document
Is the trade mark policy basically the one published in the wiki? [0] Or
> is it another one (and is this the published somewhere else)?
>
>
>
> Best regards,
>
> Dennis
>
>
> [0] https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/TDF/Policies/Trademark_Policy
>
>
--
*Simon Phip
Hi Brett!
On Fri, Feb 28, 2020 at 2:05 PM Brett Cornwall wrote:
>
> Other Free Software projects have had for-profit entities created
> underneath the stewardship of a non-profit; Mozilla Corporation and
> Canonical are two living examples. Sacrifices to user empowerment are often
> made at Mozi
On Mon, Mar 2, 2020 at 4:32 AM Brett Cornwall wrote:
> I believe that Canonical is related here because, like TDC, the proposal
> appears to be that a for-profit entity be given exclusive rights to a
> trademark to a supposed community-owned product. Like TDC, Canonical's
> founding idealized Shu
On Mon, Mar 2, 2020 at 10:57 AM Dennis Roczek
wrote:
> Hi Simon,
> Am 02.03.2020 um 11:02 schrieb Simon Phipps:
>
> On Mon, Mar 2, 2020 at 4:32 AM Brett Cornwall wrote:
>
>> I believe that Canonical is related here because, like TDC, the proposal
>> appears to be
Hi Florian,
Item 4 on the agenda is a significant change to past decisions on the
subject by the Board. Is there any background information such as a paper
describing the rationale and impact of the change please?
Thanks!
Simon
On Mon, May 18, 2020 at 8:31 AM Florian Effenberger <
flo...@docume
lic discussion so you are very
> welcome to participate.
>
> Ciao
>
> Paolo
>
> On 20/05/2020 16:17, Simon Phipps wrote:
>
> Hi Florian,
>
> Item 4 on the agenda is a significant change to past decisions on the
> subject by the Board. Is there any background informa
wrote:
> Sorry Simon but I've re-read the email I sent out and I don't where it
> says what you imply, quite the opposite.
>
> "See" you on Friday.
>
> Paolo
>
>
> On 20/05/2020 17:25, Simon Phipps wrote:
>
> So you're saying there i
On Fri, May 22, 2020 at 9:40 AM Florian Effenberger <
flo...@documentfoundation.org> wrote:
>
>
> * Wrt. item #4 (vote proposal), this item will be turned into a
> discussion item. The rationale for this is that more input from the
> community is sought, before the item can be turned into a vote.
A survey form would be the best way to go about it.
Also note that - regardless of package availability - as conceived
Libreoffice Online is beyond the scope of most individuals as it requires
access to cloud infrastructure, familiarity with certificates and a
willingness to manage web security. T
On Fri, May 22, 2020 at 4:37 PM Daniel Armando Rodriguez <
drodrig...@documentfoundation.org> wrote:
> El 2020-05-22 10:33, Heiko Tietze escribió:
> > On 22.05.20 16:09, Simon Phipps wrote:
> >> A survey form would be the best way to go a about it
> >
> > Happ
Hi!
On Fri, May 22, 2020 at 9:06 PM Andras Timar wrote:
> I disagree. It's a myth. Yes, it can be hard, when firewalls, load
> balancers, 5 users etc. are involved. It's the case when one needs
> professional support. But for the hobbyist, how hard is it to install CODE
> with a few clicks i
On Fri, May 22, 2020 at 9:56 PM Andras Timar wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, May 22, 2020 at 10:29 PM Simon Phipps wrote:
>
>> Hi!
>>
>> On Fri, May 22, 2020 at 9:06 PM Andras Timar wrote:
>>
>>> I disagree. It's a myth. Yes, it can be hard, when f
On Thu, Jul 9, 2020 at 5:47 PM Andreas Mantke wrote:
>
> please read through the whole discussion and you may get an impression
> that there are some intent to use TDF for such a promotion.
>
However, those with that impression are entirely mistaken and it is wrong
to imply anyone is attempting
On Thu, 9 Jul 2020, 18:47 Kev M, wrote:
>
> To point to links and mailing lists that anyone under the age of 40
> probably does not use regularly
>
This kind of discriminatory language is not called for, does not help and I
am asking for it not to be repeated please.
Thanks,
Simon
>
ffice even if they heavily
> > use it. For me, it made most sense to "pay" for our open-source use as
> > a volunteer LibreOffice developer.
>
> This is an important aspect. Shaming people for not paying for
> LibreOffice without knowing the background is not the ri
moderate their exercise of rights. It will just become
factional and partisan based on external agendas.
S.
--
*Simon Phipps*
*Meshed Insights Ltd*
On Fri, Jul 17, 2020 at 6:19 PM Daniel Armando Rodriguez <
drodrig...@documentfoundation.org> wrote:
> El 2020-07-17 13:20, Simon Phipps escribió:
> > There is also CONSUL, which was developed as open source by Madrid City
> > Council, transferred to an independent Found
58cd-2125-4d29-86b1-0097c7dc47d7
>-
>
> https://medium.com/@chrisconnick/how-to-make-a-prezi-in-powerpoint-as-told-by-a-prezi-expert-bdc3c91a3f09
>
> -
> Thank you!
> Edmund Laugasson
>
>
--
*Simon Phipps*
*Office:* +1 (415) 683-7660 *or* +44 (238) 098 7027
*Signal/Mobile*: +44 774 776 2816
I was not aware you were a candidate, Daniel. Did I miss your nomination?
S.
On Fri, Sep 4, 2020 at 2:29 PM Daniel Armando Rodriguez <
drodrig...@documentfoundation.org> wrote:
> El 2020-09-04 08:17, Michael Meeks escribió:
> > Hi Andreas,
> >
> > On 03/09/2020 19:59, Andreas Mantke wrote:
> >>
ep 4, 2020 at 3:09 PM Franklin Weng wrote:
> Did you mean that Daniel has no rights to speak out his question? If so,
> In what rules say only candidates can reply questions to MC candidates?
>
> If no, then why did you ask such a question?
>
> F
> Simon Phipps 於 2020/9/4 下午9
Hi Michael,
On Fri, Oct 2, 2020 at 9:11 AM Michael Meeks
wrote:
>
> Personally I think there may be merit in a UK option still - if Simon is
> interested in engaging.
>
I'd be happy to be involved in such an entity, sure. The problem last time
was that, having taken all the steps necessary to g
7;t discuss it in detail.
>>
>> Florian
>>
>
>
> --
> Quentin Christensen
> Training and Support Manager
>
> Web: www.nvaccess.org
> Training: https://www.nvaccess.org/shop/
> Certification: https://certification.nvaccess.org/
> User group: https://nvda.groups.io/g/nvda
> Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/NVAccess
> Twitter: @NVAccess <https://twitter.com/NVAccess>
>
--
*Simon Phipps*
*Office:* +1 (415) 683-7660 *or* +44 (238) 098 7027
tfoundation.org
> Problems?
> https://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
> Posting guidelines + more: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
> List archive:
> https://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/board-discuss/
> Privacy Policy: https://www.documentfoundation.org/privacy
>
>
--
*Simon Phipps*
*Office:* +1 (415) 683-7660 *or* +44 (238) 098 7027
*Signal/Mobile*: +44 774 776 2816
cations don't generally
resolve disputes. While it makes sense to "freeze" (interpreting that
sensibly for each part of the matter) it does not make sense to behave as
if we are removing every trace and building a competing project (yet).
Cheers,
Simon
--
*Simon Phipps*
*Office:
Daniel, the issue is much more complex than that. Happy to explain on a
call if you are interested in what honestly happened before you were
elected.
S.
On Wed, Jan 13, 2021 at 9:59 PM Daniel A. Rodriguez <
drodrig...@documentfoundation.org> wrote:
> Don't think the kindness being an issue here
-mail to: board-discuss+unsubscr...@documentfoundation.org
> Problems?
> https://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
> Posting guidelines + more: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
> List archive:
> https://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/ww
On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 11:16 PM Michael Meeks
wrote:
>
> On 23/03/2021 18:56, Andreas Mantke wrote:
> > Am 23.03.21 um 19:11 schrieb Italo Vignoli:
> >> OSI statement: https://opensource.org/OSI_Response
> >
> > great and consequent statement.
>
> Perhaps more measured than:
>
>
chen Rechts
> Legal details: https://www.documentfoundation.org/imprint
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe e-mail to: board-discuss+unsubscr...@documentfoundation.org
> Problems?
> https://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
> Posting guidelines + more: https:/
f Directors
>> The Document Foundation, Kurfürstendamm 188, 10707 Berlin, DE
>> Gemeinnützige rechtsfähige Stiftung des bürgerlichen Rechts
>> Legal details: https://www.documentfoundation.org/imprint
>>
>>
>> --
>> To unsubscribe e-mail to:
>> board-discus
edure which has my full support as well as the
> support of other Directors.
>
> The official Board vote will start next week.
>
> Ciao
>
> Paolo
>
> On 05/10/2021 13:11, Simon Phipps wrote:
>
> Just to be clear, Emiliano, is this an official Board communication or a
y approved will arise
so that there is no taint of partisanship. Do you or your fellow directors
have insight when that is planned? I don't recall seeing it mentioned in
previous minutes but I may have overlooked it.
> I hope this clarifies your doubts.
Very useful - thanks again for yo
Hi Emiliano, and thanks for your reply! I'm grateful for the effort you are
putting in to this activity.
On Fri, Oct 8, 2021 at 10:37 AM Emiliano Vavassori <
emiliano.vavass...@documentfoundation.org> wrote:.
>
> Someone, inside the Board, asked to extend the proposed policy by
> default to any m
e things that gets
things done in a timely manner rather than consigning them forever to
discussion.
HTH,
Simon
On Sun, Oct 10, 2021 at 10:17 AM Uwe Altmann wrote:
> Hi Simom
>
> Am 06.10.21 um 14:46 schrieb Simon Phipps:
> > I will note none of the text has been supplied to o
office.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
> Posting guidelines + more: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
> List archive:
> https://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/board-discuss/
> Privacy Policy: https://www.documentfoundation.org/privacy
>
>
--
*Simon Phipps*
*Office:* +1 (415) 683-7660 *or* +44 (238) 098 7027
*Signal/Mobile*: +44 774 776 2816
Hi! Please can you clarify who was present in the secret part of the
meeting?
Thanks
Simon
On Wed, 27 Oct 2021, 12:21 Stephan Ficht, <
stephan.fi...@documentfoundation.org> wrote:
> The Document Foundation
> Board of Directors Meeting 2021-10-22
> Meeting Minutes
>
> Date: 2021-10-22
> Location
Hi Stephen
On Thu, Oct 28, 2021 at 9:36 AM Stephan Ficht <
stephan.fi...@documentfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> Am 27.10.21 um 14:17 schrieb Simon Phipps:
> > who was present in the secret part of the meeting?
>
> The general public has to leave after the public part has
Many thanks Paolo.
On Thu, Oct 28, 2021 at 1:32 PM Paolo Vecchi <
paolo.vec...@documentfoundation.org> wrote:
> there were no external participants at the meeting.
>
I appreciate the confirmation. My request to see the attendees of this part
of the meeting explicitly listed in the minutes stands
On Thu, Oct 28, 2021 at 2:24 PM Paolo Vecchi <
paolo.vec...@documentfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> On 28/10/2021 15:11, Simon Phipps wrote:
>
> While we're talking terminology, I have to point out that the word
> "external" is not appropriate here.
>
>
>
Who participated in the vote please? Detached from the minutes its not
obvious.
Thanks
Simon
On Tue, 23 Nov 2021, 06:50 Emiliano Vavassori, <
emiliano.vavass...@documentfoundation.org> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> the following decision, which was taken in private on 2021-10-15, is now
> made public in a
inside its
"umbrella" rather than treating some as clean and some as unclean.
I very much hope the new Board will engage positively and unanimously on
these things. I'm not finding the current conversation encouraging but I
have hopes the new team will take a firm hold and change th
Hi Andreas! Hi Sophie!
On Sat, Jan 15, 2022 at 8:55 AM Andreas Mantke wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Am 14.01.22 um 19:14 schrieb Simon Phipps:
>
> > If TDF is to satisfy its mission this has to stop. The new Board has a
> > huge opportunity and responsibility to put all this
Hi Marco! Thanks for contributing.
On Mon, Jan 17, 2022 at 10:52 AM Marco Marinello
wrote:
>
> regarding, as per subject of the thread, counterproposal(s) to the
> "actization" of LibreOffice Online, were barely discussed.
>
My apologies for the delay Marco, I had meant to comment on your prop
Hi Marco!
On Tue, Jan 18, 2022 at 9:06 AM Marco Marinello
wrote:
> Hi Simon,
> Il 17/01/22 18:15, Simon Phipps ha scritto:
>
> I especially liked something in your first idea:
>
> TDF should publicly endorse
>> this choice, stating that the project is now hosted on Githu
her
perform them, lead a team performing them or select a contractor to perform
them.
Cheers,
Simon
--
*Simon Phipps*
*TDF Trustee*
Hi Andreas!
On Tue, Feb 8, 2022 at 5:59 PM Andreas Mantke wrote:
>
> but it wouldn't improve the situation, if - like today - the experienced
> fisherman / fishermen take every new talented fisher immediately from
> the free software developer (volunteer) market.
>
> Thus there is now chance for
Hi Sophi!
On Wed, Feb 9, 2022 at 3:32 PM sophi wrote:
> Hi Kendy,
> Le 09/02/2022 à 15:57, Jan Holesovsky a écrit :
> > Hi Paolo,
> >
> > Paolo Vecchi píše v St 09. 02. 2022 v 15:09 +0100:
> >
> >> The community and our valuable members of the ecosystem have been
> >> asking us to invest more in
a role has long-term implications then on which kind of tasks,
> features or bugfixes can be done in-house.
>
> Cheers,
>
> -- Thorsten
>
--
*Simon Phipps*
*TDF Trustee*
g it. It has led to an essential discussion becoming yet another
divisive fight and that's got to stop.
Cheers!
Simon
--
*Simon Phipps*
*TDF Trustee*
from the vested
interests of almost all the directors, so addressing it is going to be
tough. I certainly don't want to "just hire a few people and see what
happens" on this one!
Cheers!
Simon
--
*Simon Phipps*
*TDF Trustee*
equire sufficient "karma", e.g. from answering on user forums or by
virtue of being a Trustee, or possibly by donating to the fund. We had
hoped to prefer "new" contributors in the tendering process, and also make
it agile enough to not require a specialist sales-person to par
to clarify any doubts the provided proposal
> will raise.
>
> Cheers,
> --
> Emiliano Vavassori
> syntaxerror...@libreoffice.org
>
>
--
*Simon Phipps*
*TDF Trustee*
oup is in control
of TDF is to be overcome.
Again, thanks for your work here and I remain happy to help.
Cheers!
Simon
--
*Simon Phipps*
*TDF Trustee*
I support the request Andreas had make and ask the Board to act as soon as
possible.
S.
On Fri, 25 Feb 2022, 13:30 Andreas Mantke, wrote:
> Hi,
>
> according to the TDF website
> (https://www.documentfoundation.org/governance/advisory-board/) LLC
> Rubitech-Astra is currently member of the TDF
t decided to suspend the AB membership.
>
Thanks to the Board for this prompt action. Lothar's proposal for further
steps was a good one. Will TDF be following his proposal?
Cheers
Simon
--
*Simon Phipps*
*TDF Trustee*
ese
details, even if the full rationale is not made public (which would also be
preferable). If it remains sensitive, advise the Trustees on the mailing
list created for that purpose. Continuing to withhold them will make people
think there's something to hide, and I am sure that's not the case.
Cheers
Simon
--
*Simon Phipps*
*TDF Trustee*
Can you tell is the voting details please?
Thanks
Simon
On Thu, 31 Mar 2022, 18:36 Florian Effenberger, <
flo...@documentfoundation.org> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> find below a summary of the preliminary budget that the Board of
> Directors agreed on 2022-03-28. It is now made public in accordance wit
tails: https://www.documentfoundation.org/imprint
>
> --
> To unsubscribe e-mail to: board-discuss+unsubscr...@documentfoundation.org
> Problems?
> https://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
> Posting guidelines + more: https://wiki.documentfoundation.o
ons.
Many thanks!
Simon
--
*Simon Phipps*, * Trustee, *The Document Foundation
t.
>
> Looking forward to your feedback,
>
> Ilmari
>
> [1]
>
> https://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/board-discuss/2022/msg00400.html
>
>
--
*Simon Phipps*, * Trustee, *The Document Foundation
her
> > >> constructively, but
> > >> rather "fight against each other". But I think that's a problem on a
> > >> completely
> > >> different level, and I don't see how TDF can properly serve it's
> > >> purpose then
> > >> anyway, regardless of the specific question around TDF-internal
> > >> developers
> > >> being discussed here...
> > >
> >
> > On some topics we work constructively together while in others it looks
> > like some changes are being violently pushed back by some.
> >
> > The rationale for opposing some changes is generally not expressed in
> > full but, reading a recent comment, some community members seem to be
> > forming a clear opinion about it.
> >
> > >
> > > Best regards,
> > > Michael
> > >
> > > [1]
> > >
> https://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/board-discuss/2022/msg00357.html
> > > [2]
> > >
> https://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/board-discuss/2022/msg00209.html
> > >
> > Ciao
> >
> > Paolo
> >
> > --
> > Paolo Vecchi - Member of the Board of Directors
> > The Document Foundation, Kurfürstendamm 188, 10707 Berlin, DE
> > Gemeinnützige rechtsfähige Stiftung des bürgerlichen Rechts
> > Legal details: https://www.documentfoundation.org/imprint
> >
>
> --
> To unsubscribe e-mail to: board-discuss+unsubscr...@documentfoundation.org
> Problems?
> https://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
> Posting guidelines + more: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
> List archive:
> https://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/board-discuss/
> Privacy Policy: https://www.documentfoundation.org/privacy
>
>
--
*Simon Phipps*
*Office:* +1 (415) 683-7660 *or* +44 (238) 098 7027
*Signal/Mobile*: +44 774 776 2816
Would you be able to give us some more background to this please? While
it's good to have the decision public, without the context of the request
it is hard to understand the merits of this large unbudgeted expenditure.
If that remains sensitive, perhaps post to the list only Trustees can read.
As
It was an excellent idea to make the document editable, thanks Kendy, so I
have added some words to this effect. Feel free to improve them!
Cheers
Simon
--
*Simon Phipps*
*TDF Trustee*
print
>
> --
> To unsubscribe e-mail to: board-discuss+unsubscr...@documentfoundation.org
> Problems?
> https://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
> Posting guidelines + more: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
> List archive:
> https://li
y document instead of the one multiple people have been
working on.
Cheers
Simon
--
*Simon Phipps*
*TDF Trustee*
ain about the removal of a source of
> income for companies.
>
> But the whole process with the app-store management was based on trust
> between TDF and the companies. And since the process about LOOL and the
> fork this trust was broken.
>
> It should be obvious now that such decisions could lead to 'unexpected'
> (for the doer) consequences in other areas.
>
> Regards,
> Andreas
>
> --
> ## Free Software Advocate
> ## Plone add-on developer
> ## My blog: http://www.amantke.de/blog
>
--
*Simon Phipps*
*TDF Trustee*
the Board and the
Foundation, you have continued to snipe from the sidelines at every
opportunity, always critical and never building on the contributions of
others. Again, I recommend you withdraw.
Sincerely,
Simon
--
*Simon Phipps*
*TDF Trustee*
tting a high quality LibreOffice into
> the Windows app-store to make it more accessible to people too. I'm
> not sure that I have the exact list right here but I'd like to call
> out Marina Latini, Vasily Melenchuk, Samuel Mehrbrodt and Thorsten
> Behrens for making the go
Hi Emilliano,
On Sun, Jun 12, 2022 at 9:31 AM Emiliano Vavassori <
syntaxerror...@libreoffice.org> wrote:
> Hi Simon,
>
> Il 11/06/22 20:02, Simon Phipps ha scritto:
> > I will remind you
> > that you started this negative approach about how TDF is acting
> > ill
Hi Emiliano,
On Sun, Jun 12, 2022 at 11:03 AM Emiliano Vavassori <
syntaxerror...@libreoffice.org> wrote:
> Hi Simon,
>
> Il 12/06/22 11:17, Simon Phipps ha scritto:
> > I am sorry you do not find this helpful, but being
> > aware of the true history of the project
e:
> https://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/board-discuss/
> Privacy Policy: https://www.documentfoundation.org/privacy
>
>
--
*Simon Phipps*
*Office:* +1 (415) 683-7660 *or* +44 (238) 098 7027
*Signal/Mobile*: +44 774 776 2816
ry to be back ported) and
> bugfixes will be back ported to LOOL (and OxOOL community version too).
>
> Of course, after reliving LOOL all developers are welcomed to contribute
> to LOOL.
>
> Details can be discussed with OSSII.
>
> Regards,
> Franklin
>
--
*Simon Phipps*
*TDF Trustee*
Given the discussion of the matter is being held in secret, perhaps the
directors could arrange for a summary of the rationale for this
out-of-cycle change please?
Thanks,
Simon
On Thu, Jul 21, 2022 at 10:19 PM Cor Nouws
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This vote was brought in discussion on the directors@ f
be/
> Posting guidelines + more: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
> List archive:
> https://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/board-discuss/
> Privacy Policy: https://www.documentfoundation.org/privacy
>
>
--
*Simon Phipps*
*Office:* +1 (415) 683-7660 *or* +44 (238) 098 7027
*Signal/Telegram/Mobile*: +44 774 776 2816
t here is out-of-order.
While delays are frustrating - my own bug reports remain unfixed after a
decade - it is also very frustrating to see a contributor circumvent TDF's
well-tested processes, especially for political ends.
Cheers
Simon
--
*Simon Phipps*
*TDF Trustee*
On Mon, Oct 17, 2022 at 4:09 AM Thorsten Behrens
wrote:
>
> There are good reasons to have a quick private discussion on the matter.
>
Not least the appaling, performative, chaotic behaviour and disrespect for
the chair and order of the meeting that we saw at the last meeting. It is
right for th
tion and it appears to have almost all been based on
misunderstandings of the terms used.
Cheers
Simon
--
*Simon Phipps*
*TDF Trustee*
while ago on the subject that may help; see
https://minkiver.se/~/WebminkInDraft/Trusting-Charity-Directors
Cheers
Simon
--
*Simon Phipps*
*TDF Trustee*
1 - 100 of 160 matches
Mail list logo
