[board-discuss] List Moderation - Apply Double Standards?

Hi all, I took some time to observe the situation on this list. The list was set under moderation, because some of the board members felt, the discussion here was not friendly enough. The proposal for the moderation was supported on this list by another TDF director first (on this list). Then a

[board-discuss] no obvious double-standards (was: List Moderation - Apply Double Standards?)

Hi Andreas, all, your assessment of the situation does not seem accurate. The fact that all TDF directors can currently approve emails to this list, should ensure balance. Andreas Mantke wrote: > The list was set under moderation, because some of the board members > felt, the discussion here was

[board-discuss] [ANN] Announcing the election for the next TDF Membership Committee

Announcing the election for the next TDF Membership Committee Dear Community, we hereby officially announce the upcoming election for the next Membership Committee of The Document Foundation. As per § 12 II of our statutes, [1] the Membership Committee's term lasts two years. The current Members

[board-discuss] Board of Directors Meeting 2022-07-11

The Document Foundation Board of Directors Meeting 2022-07-11 Meeting Minutes Date: 2022-07-11 Location: Jitsi Session chair: Thorsten Behrens Keeper of the minutes: Stephan Ficht In the meeting: Board Members - Thorsten Behrens, Paolo Vecchi, László Németh, Jan Holešovský, Cor Nouws, Emil

Re: [board-discuss] no obvious double-standards (was: List Moderation - Apply Double Standards?)

Hi all, On 15/07/2022 11:52, Thorsten Behrens wrote: It looks like if some of the board members, which support the list moderation, have the intention to ban uncomfortable discussions in terms of content and the process from this list. The fact that your email passed moderation should be testa