On 26.11.20 11:02, Florian Effenberger wrote:
1. to freeze (not delete) the "online" repository at TDF's git
+1
1b. to switch the https://github.com/libreoffice/online mirror
0
2. to freeze (not delete) the translations for online in Weblate
0
OpenPGP_0xA68C0CA5EEA5F466.asc
Description:
On 26.11.20 11:02, Florian Effenberger wrote:
1. to freeze (not delete) the "online" repository at TDF's git, for the time
being
+1
1b. to switch the https://github.com/libreoffice/online mirror to instead
mirror
0 (mirror COOL at LOOL might be confusing for volunteers)
+1 (if we could forwar
2020年11月26日 18:04:02 Florian Effenberger :
> Hello,
>
> parallel to the VOTE thread that has been posted to this list a minute ago,
> here's the respective DISCUSS thread for questions.
>
>> The vote that has been proposed is the following:
>> 1. to freeze (not delete) the "online" repository a
Please will those voting against the proposal explain their reasoning and
the alternative outcome they are supporting?
Thanks
Simon
On Thu, Nov 26, 2020 at 10:03 AM Florian Effenberger <
flo...@documentfoundation.org> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> last Friday, the board discussed about LibreOffice Online
Not sure if my previous post was successfully posted or not, here use my
own email address to post again. Sorry if you got duplicated posts.
Florian Effenberger 於 2020年11月26日 週四 18:03
寫道：
> Hello,
>
> last Friday, the board discussed about LibreOffice Online. [1] During
> the call and in the di
Simple answer: freezing the LOOL repository gives a very strong
negative message.
No matter what the alternative outcome will be, it will be better than
watching the repo become stale, which is also some others' worries.
Franklin
Simon Phipps 於 2020/11/29 下午7:35 寫道:
Please will those vot
Eike Rathke 於 2020/11/27 下午9:45 寫道:
Hi,
On Thursday, 2020-11-26 11:02:46 +0100, Florian Effenberger wrote:
1. to freeze (not delete) the "online" repository at TDF's git, for the time
being
What exactly is meant here?
Would it be mirrored from the Collabora github repo but gerrit disabled
f
>From TDF we must recognize the strategic importance of LOOL. That is why the
>repository must remain active. That way, those who wish to join and make the
>project shine, can do so. At the same time, as Paolo mentions, we must make
>sure that the set of tools offered is friendly enough for newc
