Hello,
tonight at 1800 UTC+1 (German time), i.e. in about 5 hours, we have a
marketing conference call. The agenda will be mainly about the 3.3
release, I doubt we will have much time for other topics, unless they
are really urgent. :-) I explicitly do *not* want to talk about the
Drupal topi
Hello,
the next SC phone conference will be on Friday, January 21st, 1700 UTC.
For your local date and time, see http://www.doodle.com/mqhh96d6uad9b47i
Please add your desired agenda items to
http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/TDF/Steering_Committee_Meetings#Agenda
The current list of dial-
Hi Florian, :-)
Wow! What inconvenient timing... We had planned the website conference
call for Friday 21 January @ 5pm
GMT too! I was going to catch you on the Marketing call tonight to ask
you if you could give us the codes for that...
Is there any chance you could maybe re-schedule the SC call
On Thu, 2011-01-20 at 12:47 +0100, Florian Effenberger wrote:
> I explicitly do *not* want to talk about the
> Drupal topic in this call, please let's focus on the 3.3 release
> first.
I totally agree -
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to steering-discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
List
Hi David,
David Nelson wrote on 2011-01-20 13.11:
Wow! What inconvenient timing... We had planned the website conference
call for Friday 21 January @ 5pm
GMT too! I was going to catch you on the Marketing call tonight to ask
you if you could give us the codes for that...
ah, sh...
I'm sorry,
Hi, :-)
Could you maybe make it 2 hours later? This would be likely to be a
long call.
David Nelson
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to steering-discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/steering-discuss/
*** All posts to this list a
Hi Florian, all,
On 20/01/2011 15:37, Florian Effenberger wrote:
Hi David,
David Nelson wrote on 2011-01-20 13.11:
Wow! What inconvenient timing... We had planned the website conference
call for Friday 21 January @ 5pm
GMT too! I was going to catch you on the Marketing call tonight to ask
you
Hi, :-)
If you could have the SC call at 19.00 UTC it would be so great...
This is a very special conversation we want to have tomorrow, and it's
likely to be lnngg...
David Nelson
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to steering-discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
List archive: http://lista
Hi David,
David Nelson wrote on 2011-01-18 22.36:
My request for the alfresco.libreoffice.org sub-domain still holds.
I am willing to offer Christian/Florian full root access to the
system, if necessary, and to comply with all feasible requirements to
satisfy TDF.
Would it be appropriate to r
Hi,
David Nelson wrote on 2011-01-20 13.43:
If you could have the SC call at 19.00 UTC it would be so great...
This is a very special conversation we want to have tomorrow, and it's
likely to be lnngg...
honestly, I would have appreciated if the website folks had *first*
checked the SC po
Hi Davi, *
> Von: Florian Effenberger
>
> David Nelson wrote on 2011-01-18 22.36:
>
> > My request for the alfresco.libreoffice.org sub-domain still holds.
> >
> > I am willing to offer Christian/Florian full root access to the
> > system, if necessary, and to comply with all feasible requirem
Hi,
Le Thu, 20 Jan 2011 20:43:39 +0800,
David Nelson a écrit :
> Hi, :-)
>
> If you could have the SC call at 19.00 UTC it would be so great...
> This is a very special conversation we want to have tomorrow, and it's
> likely to be lnngg...
>
> David Nelson
>
We could have the other cal
Le Thu, 20 Jan 2011 13:47:57 +0100,
Florian Effenberger a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> David Nelson wrote on 2011-01-20 13.43:
> > If you could have the SC call at 19.00 UTC it would be so great...
> > This is a very special conversation we want to have tomorrow, and
> > it's likely to be lnngg...
>
>
I am in the process of doing just that. Rescheduling the website meeting.
Sent from my Android phone.
On 20/01/2011 10:44 PM, "Charles-H. Schulz" <
charles.sch...@documentfoundation.org> wrote:
> Le Thu, 20 Jan 2011 13:47:57 +0100,
> Florian Effenberger a écrit :
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> David Nelson wrote
Thanks a lot Michael. Really appreciated. Just added my availability to
Doodle.
Michael Wheatland wrote on 2011-01-20 15.00:
I am in the process of doing just that. Rescheduling the website meeting.
--
Florian Effenberger
Steering Committee and Founding Member of The Document Foundation
Tel:
Hi Florian, :-)
All the active members of the docs team have accounts on the Alfresco
site I'm hosting right now. There is a general consensus/willingness
to use it, and people have already started trying it out for actual
work.
Putting it under a TDF sub-domain will only further strengthen
peopl
Hi Charles, :-)
I understand that Mike is rescheduling the call. I'll fit in with
whatever time is chosen. (It will be about 2 a.m. my time, most
likely, if 19.00 UTC is chosen.)
David Nelson
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to steering-discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
List archive: http:
>From my point of view, Alfresco is great, but just for better understanding,
who is sponsoring your server? What would be your benefit?
And how can you warranty the uptime and performance and for how long?
Cheers!
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 15:02, David Nelson wrote:
> Hi Florian, :-)
>
> All t
On Thu, 2011-01-20 at 13:45 +0100, Florian Effenberger wrote:
> So, don't take this as a refusal, but just a question for the ease of
> use: Would theoretically hosting Alfresco on one of our servers also be
> an option to consider, or do you see huge advantages of having it on yours?
J
Come on, an Alfresco image is even offered by Amazon, you can download the
Community version, which is certified only to work with OpenSource, so the
only problem is that it doesn't work with proprietary SW (e.g. Windows). You
can try it out yourself: http://www.alfresco.com/try/
There are other b
David,
sorry if I joined discussion only late, maybe my questions have been
answered already, so bear with me please.
On Thursday 20 January 2011 15:02, David Nelson wrote:
> All the active members of the docs team have accounts on the Alfresco
> site I'm hosting right now.
1) Is there any i
Indeed, thanks a lot Michael and sorry for the inconvenience.
Best,
Charles.
Le 20 janv. 2011, 3:02 PM, "Florian Effenberger" <
flo...@documentfoundation.org> a écrit :
Thanks a lot Michael. Really appreciated. Just added my availability to
Doodle.
Michael Wheatland wrote on 2011-01-20 15.00:
Hi, :-)
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 23:20, Nino Novak wrote:
> 1) Is there any integration (planned?) with odfauthors or is it just
> about a new and different place to produce documentation (specific for
> libreoffice maybe)?
IMHO, it is in the best interests of LibreOffice project for the
LibreOff
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/20/2011 04:18 PM, David Nelson wrote:
> suggested to her to take team leadership of the LibreOffice docs teamI
> two times in the past. But she's very much occupied with odfauthors.
Need I point out that Jean has been running OOoAuthors for the
Hi David, Nino, *,
Am Donnerstag, 20. Januar 2011, 17:18:09 schrieb David Nelson:
> Hi, :-)
>
> On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 23:20, Nino Novak wrote:
> > 1) Is there any integration (planned?) with odfauthors or is it just
> > about a new and different place to produce documentation (specific for
> >
Hi Andreas, :-)
You're obviously entitled to your opinions, and I'm obviously entitled
to mine. ;-)
But this is a request that I'm submitting to the SC for their consideration.
David Nelson
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 22:02, David Nelson wrote:
> Hi Florian, :-)
>
> All the active members of the d
Hi David, *,
Am Donnerstag, 20. Januar 2011, 20:33:59 schrieb David Nelson:
> Hi Andreas, :-)
>
> You're obviously entitled to your opinions, and I'm obviously entitled
> to mine. ;-)
>
> But this is a request that I'm submitting to the SC for their
> consideration.
I read your submitting alrea
Hi Andreas, :-)
Thought: I think that odfauthors.org is a great resource for smaller
Open Source projects that don't have the people, time or resources to
properly develop their own documentation.
But I think it's in the best interests of a *major* software project
like LibreOffice to have an in-
Hi David, *,
I don't know what is your purpose. You sent your submitting to the SC a third
time
now (if I count right). Why are you doing this. I told you in my last mail that
this
is not necessary. You pay no attention to the netiquette. What's the reason for
your
behavior? I'm very curious
Hi Andreas, :-)
IMHO, the odfauthors.org software is far from being an ideal tool for
the LibreOffice docs team.
A) The odfauthors.org software is a product of a past time, when
leading-edge systems like Alfresco had not yet reached maturity, that
does not have all the features and power of a ful
30 matches
Mail list logo