Hello,
for the records: During one of the last SC calls, we agreed to connect
that server as alfresco.libreoffice.org.
I am still busy with fighting my inbox, but I will manage taking care of
the DNS stuff hopefully soon. :-)
Florian
--
Florian Effenberger
Steering Committee and Founding
Hi Andreas, :-)
IMHO, the odfauthors.org software is far from being an ideal tool for
the LibreOffice docs team.
A) The odfauthors.org software is a product of a past time, when
leading-edge systems like Alfresco had not yet reached maturity, that
does not have all the features and power of a ful
Hi David, *,
I don't know what is your purpose. You sent your submitting to the SC a third
time
now (if I count right). Why are you doing this. I told you in my last mail that
this
is not necessary. You pay no attention to the netiquette. What's the reason for
your
behavior? I'm very curious
Hi Andreas, :-)
Thought: I think that odfauthors.org is a great resource for smaller
Open Source projects that don't have the people, time or resources to
properly develop their own documentation.
But I think it's in the best interests of a *major* software project
like LibreOffice to have an in-
Hi David, *,
Am Donnerstag, 20. Januar 2011, 20:33:59 schrieb David Nelson:
> Hi Andreas, :-)
>
> You're obviously entitled to your opinions, and I'm obviously entitled
> to mine. ;-)
>
> But this is a request that I'm submitting to the SC for their
> consideration.
I read your submitting alrea
Hi Andreas, :-)
You're obviously entitled to your opinions, and I'm obviously entitled
to mine. ;-)
But this is a request that I'm submitting to the SC for their consideration.
David Nelson
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 22:02, David Nelson wrote:
> Hi Florian, :-)
>
> All the active members of the d
Hi David, Nino, *,
Am Donnerstag, 20. Januar 2011, 17:18:09 schrieb David Nelson:
> Hi, :-)
>
> On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 23:20, Nino Novak wrote:
> > 1) Is there any integration (planned?) with odfauthors or is it just
> > about a new and different place to produce documentation (specific for
> >
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/20/2011 04:18 PM, David Nelson wrote:
> suggested to her to take team leadership of the LibreOffice docs teamI
> two times in the past. But she's very much occupied with odfauthors.
Need I point out that Jean has been running OOoAuthors for the
Hi, :-)
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 23:20, Nino Novak wrote:
> 1) Is there any integration (planned?) with odfauthors or is it just
> about a new and different place to produce documentation (specific for
> libreoffice maybe)?
IMHO, it is in the best interests of LibreOffice project for the
LibreOff
David,
sorry if I joined discussion only late, maybe my questions have been
answered already, so bear with me please.
On Thursday 20 January 2011 15:02, David Nelson wrote:
> All the active members of the docs team have accounts on the Alfresco
> site I'm hosting right now.
1) Is there any i
Come on, an Alfresco image is even offered by Amazon, you can download the
Community version, which is certified only to work with OpenSource, so the
only problem is that it doesn't work with proprietary SW (e.g. Windows). You
can try it out yourself: http://www.alfresco.com/try/
There are other b
On Thu, 2011-01-20 at 13:45 +0100, Florian Effenberger wrote:
> So, don't take this as a refusal, but just a question for the ease of
> use: Would theoretically hosting Alfresco on one of our servers also be
> an option to consider, or do you see huge advantages of having it on yours?
J
>From my point of view, Alfresco is great, but just for better understanding,
who is sponsoring your server? What would be your benefit?
And how can you warranty the uptime and performance and for how long?
Cheers!
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 15:02, David Nelson wrote:
> Hi Florian, :-)
>
> All t
Hi Florian, :-)
All the active members of the docs team have accounts on the Alfresco
site I'm hosting right now. There is a general consensus/willingness
to use it, and people have already started trying it out for actual
work.
Putting it under a TDF sub-domain will only further strengthen
peopl
Hi Davi, *
> Von: Florian Effenberger
>
> David Nelson wrote on 2011-01-18 22.36:
>
> > My request for the alfresco.libreoffice.org sub-domain still holds.
> >
> > I am willing to offer Christian/Florian full root access to the
> > system, if necessary, and to comply with all feasible requirem
Hi David,
David Nelson wrote on 2011-01-18 22.36:
My request for the alfresco.libreoffice.org sub-domain still holds.
I am willing to offer Christian/Florian full root access to the
system, if necessary, and to comply with all feasible requirements to
satisfy TDF.
Would it be appropriate to r
Hi David,
Am Dienstag, 18. Januar 2011, 22:04:12 schrieb David Nelson:
> Hi Florian, :-)
>
> Ah! Now I understand why you kept me waiting for 2 weeks for any kind
> of reply to my request! :-D
>
> http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/ODFAuthors-Site-with-workflow-tp228261
> 7p2282617.html
pleas
Hi Florian, :-)
Ah! Now I understand why you kept me waiting for 2 weeks for any kind
of reply to my request! :-D
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/ODFAuthors-Site-with-workflow-tp2282617p2282617.html
David Nelson
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to steering-discuss+h...@documentfoundati
Hi Florian, :-)
On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 21:37, Florian Effenberger
wrote:
> * self-hosted servers can only be connected if they are in our
> infrastructure management and fit our security requirements
Actually, I only just properly read your original post
Is there a way I can satisfy
What do you mean by "My server has excellent 24/7 technical support."? Is
your server @ Amazon or other amazon like Company?
For a Document Management System DMS, I will definitely suggest to use
Alfresco in a secure place which guarantees 24/7 up time and support, but
definitely not a home server
Hi, :-)
The situation is that the workflow can already be considered to be 80%
or 90% complete, and the next step will be some pilot testing with
actual work on documentation content, which could start later this
week.
In parallel, I'd also been planning to throw open an invite to i18n
people who
I'm all for security and stability, but I would expect that OSS is prefered
over Proprietary services like Google Apps.
On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 19:03, Florian Effenberger <
flo...@documentfoundation.org> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> as soon as some service is hosted at the LibO or TDF domain or is otherwise
I think its best guide lines for 3rd party servers and mirrors. Once
things are well established I think it would be hard to change the
guidelines for those 3rd parties that were established prior to the
guidelines existing.
On 01/17/2011 07:01 PM, Florian Effenberger wrote:
There are no real
Hi,
Jaime R. Garza wrote on 2011-01-17 18.47:
Sorry, I'm not part of the Steering committee, but I'm very interested in
understanding the principles. I would prefer Open Source solutions like
Alfresco over Google Apps for Document Management System. Obviously with the
respective security require
There are no real policies written down as of now, as questions like
these rarely occured :-)
Jonathan Aquilina wrote on 2011-01-17 18.35:
I second your concerns on this. Are there guidelines set down in regards
to self hosted servers?
--
Florian Effenberger
Steering Committee and Founding M
I am all for OSS, i'm starting my business with nothing but open source
software. I think in my case as well as for the document foundation, the
concerns are how secure are the services provided by 3rd parties.
On 01/17/2011 06:47 PM, Jaime R. Garza wrote:
Sorry, I'm not part of the Steering c
Sorry, I'm not part of the Steering committee, but I'm very interested in
understanding the principles. I would prefer Open Source solutions like
Alfresco over Google Apps for Document Management System. Obviously with the
respective security requirements. If it's in an internal network or on
Amazo
I second your concerns on this. Are there guidelines set down in regards
to self hosted servers?
On 01/17/2011 02:37 PM, Florian Effenberger wrote:
Hello,
I received a request to connect an external Alfresco site to one of
our domain names. Apart from the concern that the workflow hadn't been
28 matches
Mail list logo
