Hi everyone!
Penny here, on the Spanish Documentation Team we mostly like the idea of
reopening that project, taking into account two things:
First, we´d like to maintain the TDF spirit about keeping things public and
open.
And second, we agree to try it for a trial period and check if this pr
+1. I also wholeheartedly agree. Thank you.
Sincerely yours,
Ade
--
To unsubscribe e-mail to: board-discuss+unsubscr...@documentfoundation.org
Problems? https://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiq
Hi all,
Thanks for sharing your opinions, but the statement here is factual
incorrect:
Daniel A. Rodriguez wrote on 10/07/2022 22:42:
We, the undersigned, would like to express our great concern regarding
the definitive closure of the repository of what was LibreOffice Online.
...
People int
My ha'penneth below.
Surely, the point of TDF is/was to foster community driven contributions
by all ?
If a languishing codebase was already there, and people are now prepared
to update it and have a go at making something of it, shouldn't TDF be
seen to be supporting such an initiative ?
-1
LOOL is just a UI flavor to me. It's nothing without the core and provides just
one way to interact with the application (admittedly some special handling which
might be important for many).
I understand COOL (and any other implementations) as a win-win situation for
TDF. If LibreOffice w
On 10.07.2022 15:42, Daniel A. Rodriguez wrote:
We, the undersigned, would like to express our great concern regarding
the definitive closure of the repository of what was LibreOffice
Online. Considering the mission of facilitating access to information
and communication technologies as a fundame
