Hi Andras,
On 02/09/2022 18:47, Andras Timar wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, Sep 2, 2022 at 5:38 PM Andreas Mantke wrote:
Hi all,
Am 01.09.22 um 23:16 schrieb Paolo Vecchi:
> Hi all,
>
> On 01/09/2022 22:47, Michael Meeks wrote:
>> I would expect the ESC should intervene and cut o
Hi,
Am 02.09.22 um 18:47 schrieb Andras Timar:
Hi,
On Fri, Sep 2, 2022 at 5:38 PM Andreas Mantke wrote:
Hi all,
Am 01.09.22 um 23:16 schrieb Paolo Vecchi:
> Hi all,
>
> On 01/09/2022 22:47, Michael Meeks wrote:
>> I would expect the ESC should intervene and cut out th
Hi,
On Fri, Sep 2, 2022 at 5:38 PM Andreas Mantke wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Am 01.09.22 um 23:16 schrieb Paolo Vecchi:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > On 01/09/2022 22:47, Michael Meeks wrote:
> >> I would expect the ESC should intervene and cut out the
> >> politics.
> >
> > I believe that politics have nothing
Hi all,
Am 01.09.22 um 23:16 schrieb Paolo Vecchi:
Hi all,
On 01/09/2022 22:47, Michael Meeks wrote:
I would expect the ESC should intervene and cut out the
politics.
I believe that politics have nothing to do with what happened.
Your grep shows that there aren't that many "lool" that could
Hi all,
On 01/09/2022 22:47, Michael Meeks wrote:
I would expect the ESC should intervene and cut out the
politics.
I believe that politics have nothing to do with what happened.
Your grep shows that there aren't that many "lool" that could be renamed
"cool" by mistake so I guess it's unlike
What a silly thread.
Some neutral name for the integration should be picked and
implemented and/or both names be accepted; I would suggest 'lok'
for LibreOfficeKit. Commit/revert wars are a nonsense that helps
no-one - I would expect the ESC should intervene and cut out the
poli
Hi Andreas,
On 01/09/2022 20:22, Andreas Mantke wrote:
I think there should be clear rules that there should not be any
barriers or something similar in the LibreOffice vanilla code.
But once I saw the changes from 'lool' to 'cool' in the source code I
wonder why the ESC didn't discussed and st
Hi all,
On 01/09/2022 19:31, Simon Phipps wrote:
TDF's Board is not expected to intervene in the ESC's work beyond its
recent approval of ESC appointees. The request here is out-of-order.
I was wondering as well why Andreas would send a request to
board-discuss for a patch.
While delays a
Hi Paolo,
Am 01.09.22 um 19:32 schrieb Paolo Vecchi:
Hi Andreas,
On 01/09/2022 18:48, Andreas Mantke wrote:
I remember variable changing going on when LOOL has been forked into
COOL, and the removal of "This file is part of the LibreOffice project
:-(, but I thought that it was affecting only
Hi Regina,
It's still the ESC's role to resolve it, not the Board's. All the work on
code is done by individuals, and open source projects don't get to instruct
individuals on what to do or when to do it - there is no SLA. If none of
those individuals are interested in prioritising any particular
Hi Andreas,
On 01/09/2022 18:48, Andreas Mantke wrote:
I remember variable changing going on when LOOL has been forked into
COOL, and the removal of "This file is part of the LibreOffice project
:-(, but I thought that it was affecting only their own repository,
not LibreOffice core so I'm surpr
Hi Paolo, all,
Am 01.09.22 um 18:09 schrieb Paolo Vecchi:
Hi Andreas,
On 01/09/2022 17:36, Andreas Mantke wrote:
It is this patch (only a small one with two lines of code):
https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/138884
I see a comment "The correct naming for LibreOffice is lool"
and a req
Hi Simon,
I think, a large delay between review and submit is not a technical
problem, but it needs a person who is responsible for an overview.
A technical problem is to provide a tool for a quick overview. However,
the dashboard-links from Guilhem look promising.
A large delay is frustratin
Hi Andreas,
On 01/09/2022 17:36, Andreas Mantke wrote:
It is this patch (only a small one with two lines of code):
https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/138884
I see a comment "The correct naming for LibreOffice is lool"
and a request to change a variable ending with cool into lool in
Lib
Hi Guilhem,
Am 01.09.22 um 17:27 schrieb Guilhem Moulin:
On Wed, 31 Aug 2022 at 19:48:57 +0200, Andreas Mantke wrote:
I wonder what is the usual time slot it needs to merge a reviewed and
ready patch into the LibreOffice repository.
https://dashboard.documentfoundation.org/app/kibana#/dashboar
Given TDF separates administrative and technical responsibilities
between the Board and ESC respectively, I am unclear why this matter is
being raised here - has it already been raised at ESC without a resolution?
Can someone explain please?
Cheers
Simon
On Thu, Sep 1, 2022 at 3:37 PM Andreas Ma
Hi all,
I think it is about this patch:
https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/138884
It has a +2 from Adolfo Jayme Barrientos but is not yet submitted.
Kind regards,
Regina
Paolo Vecchi schrieb am 01.09.2022 um 16:47:
Hi Andreas,
On 01/09/2022 16:34, Andreas Mantke wrote:
Hi Thorsten, hi a
Hi Paolo, all,
Am 01.09.22 um 17:29 schrieb Paolo Vecchi:
Hi Andreas,
On 01/09/2022 17:13, Andreas Mantke wrote:
Hi Paolo,
Am 01.09.22 um 16:47 schrieb Paolo Vecchi:
Hi Andreas,
On 01/09/2022 16:34, Andreas Mantke wrote:
I wonder if it is useful to open a second (or more than that)
communi
Hi Andreas,
On 01/09/2022 17:13, Andreas Mantke wrote:
Hi Paolo,
Am 01.09.22 um 16:47 schrieb Paolo Vecchi:
Hi Andreas,
On 01/09/2022 16:34, Andreas Mantke wrote:
I wonder if it is useful to open a second (or more than that)
communication channel for this with Gerrit for code review (with an
On Wed, 31 Aug 2022 at 19:48:57 +0200, Andreas Mantke wrote:
> I wonder what is the usual time slot it needs to merge a reviewed and
> ready patch into the LibreOffice repository.
https://dashboard.documentfoundation.org/app/kibana#/dashboard/Gerrit-Timing and
https://dashboard.documentfoundation.
Hi Paolo,
Am 01.09.22 um 16:47 schrieb Paolo Vecchi:
Hi Andreas,
On 01/09/2022 16:34, Andreas Mantke wrote:
I wonder if it is useful to open a second (or more than that)
communication channel for this with Gerrit for code review (with an
email messaging) in place. I thought that Gerrit has bee
Hi Andreas,
On 01/09/2022 16:34, Andreas Mantke wrote:
Hi Thorsten, hi all,
Am 31.08.22 um 21:28 schrieb Thorsten Behrens:
Hi Andreas,
Andreas Mantke wrote:
I wonder what is the usual time slot it needs to merge a reviewed
and ready patch into the LibreOffice repository.
Answering as a dev
Hi Thorsten, hi all,
Am 31.08.22 um 21:28 schrieb Thorsten Behrens:
Hi Andreas,
Andreas Mantke wrote:
I wonder what is the usual time slot it needs to merge a reviewed
and ready patch into the LibreOffice repository.
Answering as a developer here (and not as board member) - I think you
will
Hi Andreas,
Andreas Mantke wrote:
> I wonder what is the usual time slot it needs to merge a reviewed
> and ready patch into the LibreOffice repository.
>
Answering as a developer here (and not as board member) - I think you
will get better answers & suggestions what to do, on the LibreOffice
deve
24 matches
Mail list logo
