Re: [steering-discuss] Version numbering of LibO

2010-11-03 Thread Michael Meeks
Hi there, On Tue, 2010-11-02 at 14:57 +0100, Andre Schnabel wrote: > I'd rather continue OOo version number schema for the moment. I think being similar enough to it is worthwhile. On the other hand, I think being slaved to Hamburg's development schedule is unfortunate overall. I'd like t

Re: [steering-discuss] Version numbering of LibO

2010-11-03 Thread Olivier Hallot
Please keep the version numbering as is, for the time beeing. If we had to change it, it had to be done when we announced LibreOffice. Besides, when we change numbers to 1.0 we better get a new name because our message is that this is a new product in the markeplace. Now it is too late unless w

Re: [steering-discuss] Version numbering of LibO

2010-11-02 Thread Andre Schnabel
Hi, > Von: Sophie Gautier > An: steering-discuss@documentfoundation.org > > > > Sebastian Spaeth wrote on 2010-11-01 16.36: > >> > >> Dear all, all discussions seem to hint at that the first stable release > >> of LibreOffice is going to be a 3.3.0 release. I would like to have you > >> consider

Re: [steering-discuss] Version numbering of LibO

2010-11-02 Thread Sophie Gautier
Hi Florian, Sebastian, On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 6:03 PM, Florian Effenberger wrote: > Hi Sebastian, > > Sebastian Spaeth wrote on 2010-11-01 16.36: >> >> Dear all, all discussions seem to hint at that the first stable release >> of LibreOffice is going to be a 3.3.0 release. I would like to have yo